Introduction:
In his argument for the overturning of that “freedom of speech” limiting Act, which restricted spending by entities on political advocacy, passed in 2002, the Writer in the 9/14/2009 edition of that Popular Daily/Weekend Business Publication (A13), pointed out correctly that the Constitution doesn’t guarantee “equal” speech just the freedom to speak as described previously in another Blog’s posting by me. The argument is based on the principle that now since good ”old” technological advancement “has made it possible for everyone to express their views” it was time to overturn this "freedom busting, restrictive limitation". The Writer went on to point out that “the cost of expressing opinions continues to fall”, and with this backdrop since “speech is no longer expensive, it’s is time to return to the Founders’ intention that speech be free and that Congress not abridge anyone’s right to speak.”
This Sounds Well and Good but the Facts are These:
Whose de facto right to speak (included in this anyone), was being restricted by this Act as pointed out in this article? In reality no:
these expedient types go through all types of highly questionable and unethical means (such as the type of nepotism example described in Footnote2 below), to manipulate anything possible in order to try to obtain fleeting "legitimacy" (while using phony "photoless" identities) as outlined in the Footnote of the post FINDING CONTRIBUTORS FOR A MOGUL'S CHARITY, UPDATED in addition to item # 13 from the listing including in the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY, THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED, including disrupting the lives of others either permanently or otherwise (such as "terrorizing" the offspring of those adults whose lives were disrupted into childhood prostitution (as highlighted in the Conclusion section of the post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES, THE FINALE UPDATED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED), in a free Country and no one appears to be concerned about their cause, while some with resources "aplenty", and in other lofty positions search high and low under microscopes in foreign lands for issues and "coincidental" causes such as those described in the Here are the Events of Note section of the post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES - UPDATED & EDITED, to address as discussed in the post A CASE FOR TAX PAYMENT FROM ALL - UPDATED). These actions tend to "validate" the actions of those "fortunate" types who are relying on those "coincidental" spectacular disasters to attempt to demonstrate being "originals" according to their definition, as discussed previously as well as in item # 4 of the listing below as well as in The finale/Outcome section of the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED. The "entitled" types and the other implementers of this Trojan Horse perpetual wealth-generating alternate form of taxation without representation acted unilaterally, unethically, unlawfully, expediently and cowardly as documented in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED in my opinion and supplemented by the details in the To digress outline in the Consider the Following Scenario section of the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDATED when they:
The Finale/Outcome:
As a result, “free-loader cause” types, en masse who are supported unilaterally by entities are now unleashed in society as a result of being granted de facto “1st Amendment free speech rights” as an unintended consequence of this legislation’s overturn and depending on the size of the problem (since only an “omnipotent” power with similar connections really knows for certain how many such individuals are in existence in corporate structures and elsewhere - see the post THE ORIGINS OF "VIRTUAL" "TWO-FACED" IDENTITIES - UPDATED); it’s uncertain how many of these “free-loaders” were “freed” to roam society for those legally with the right to speak, but choosing not to participate in the voting process for one reason or another as well as citizens, to "steal" via any means possible in an attempt to gain something they never had, "credibility", using all forms of unethical methods to attempt to attain their fleeting "legitimacy", [see the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY, THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED generally for examples of the methodology used by such "shadowy free loaders" types) and as specifically described among the examples used in item # 4 of the listing in The Finale/Outcome section of the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING - EDITED AND UPDATED]. Furthermore, see the Conclusion section of the post HOW CAN THERE BE ANY DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE THAT THE STATE OF FINANCIAL FIRMS IS WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE - UPDATED for a discussion assessing the scope of the "free loaders cause" problem.
Personally since I have been surrounded by NOT ONLY specific labels and numbers since entering this State, for, which examples are depicted in the following posts:
there is no telling how many of these “free-loader's cause” types are using some variation of my, solid "foundations" from the 3rd tribe in the quest for that heavenly halo such a model of man's oldest "profession" needs for “credibility” in conjunction with corporate entities who use such individuals for unethical purposes (as discussed in the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE! (EDITED AND UPDATED)); since the real scope of the problem has the potential to be staggering. THIS IS VERY UNFAIR TO THOSE:
In his argument for the overturning of that “freedom of speech” limiting Act, which restricted spending by entities on political advocacy, passed in 2002, the Writer in the 9/14/2009 edition of that Popular Daily/Weekend Business Publication (A13), pointed out correctly that the Constitution doesn’t guarantee “equal” speech just the freedom to speak as described previously in another Blog’s posting by me. The argument is based on the principle that now since good ”old” technological advancement “has made it possible for everyone to express their views” it was time to overturn this "freedom busting, restrictive limitation". The Writer went on to point out that “the cost of expressing opinions continues to fall”, and with this backdrop since “speech is no longer expensive, it’s is time to return to the Founders’ intention that speech be free and that Congress not abridge anyone’s right to speak.”
This Sounds Well and Good but the Facts are These:
Whose de facto right to speak (included in this anyone), was being restricted by this Act as pointed out in this article? In reality no:
- actual citizen (legally born in the US), or
- naturalized citizen (legally authorized to become such)
was being denied the right to speak and could make legal contributions to campaigns already, as individuals if legally permitted to do so, as previously pointed out. The Founders being "fairness seekers" never intended allowing entities (comprised of individuals as all corporate officers and directors are) the right to speak dually, as why should a corporate officer/director ALREADY POSSESSING TO RIGHT TO "SPEAK" as an individual be granted the right to "speak" again as a corporate officer collectively? This is in effect granting such types rights NOT afforded to regular citizens many of whom will never become corporate type officers/directors. Such an action serves the purpose of:
The Court has already ruled that there is no 1st Amendment rights when what is being relied on is known to be stolen as documented in example 4 from the post WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION! - (EDITED AND UPDATED) and this was CLEARLY demonstrated to be the case as documented in Footnote2 from the post WHAT LESSONS HAVE BEEN LEARNED FROM THE RECENT FINANCIAL CRISIS - UPDATED AND AMENDED and supplemented by the below photos showing critical details about the then apartment and the replacement residence, which was purchased to transition from the then leased apartment on completion of the indicated lease below. That's why- either creating different classes of individuals (in a Land where ALL ARE SUPPOSED TO BE TREATED EQUALLY) and not granting corporate types certain privileges not afforded to others who are not so "entitled", in my opinion
- or providing an avenue for those of the "free loaders cause" to be granted "back door" citizenship (by this 1st Amendment rights decision, who are vigorously supported by most "entities" through misapplication of its true intent , by those entities who choose to adopt such "business" practices).
 |
IF ANY INDIVIDUAL FILED A POLICE REPORT INDICATING THAT DOCUMENTS WERE STOLEN FROM ANY OTHER RESIDENCE (APARTMENT #), IT'S COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT AND ONLY SERVED THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING SUCH "FREE LOADER CAUSE" TYPES WITH AN "IDENTITY CRUTCH".
|
 |
Those who in effect hide behind every action of another, namely "free loaders" wasted no time in attempting to also hide behind my purchase of the Olin residence by trying to use my pay off of a vehicle loan to feign that such was a mortgage pay of as the post THE "SOCIETY'S" WAY OF CREATING HISTORY - UPDATED documents. Here is a link to the post WHEN TRUST TURNS - UPDATED for a previous reference to the original phone number used at the original Olin, IA residence in the photo caption discussion in the Finale section.
|
- introduced "free loader cause" types secretly into this unsuspecting Nation, with the exception of a few entitled" types,
- resorted to adding "free loader cause" types with the type of mangled identities documented in the post SUPPLEMENT TO THE CASE OF THE MISSING (AND MANGLED) RECORDS - UPDATED to corporate and other structures at the expense of hiring legally qualified individuals in order to provide an air of "spirituality" for their sordid activities being carried on not too far from the public's eye when the curtains are drawn back ever so slightly, which are discussed in THE UNDERLINED DETAILS PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE CONSISTENT WITH MY DECISION... INSERT IN THE HERE ARE THE FACTS SECTION OF THE POST THE HOW TO VIOLATE FERPA AND STILL COMPLY WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED, which the God of creation who is the ONLY ONE who knows the future already had included in the Biblical book of Revelation in chapter 17 and verse 5 specifically, where, for those with wisdom and "understanding", the titles the practitioners and role model in principle of such an immoral and dishonorable activity deserve, (who persists with their activities without realizing the details surrounding their chosen "standard" bearer, which are described in the Footnote in the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED), are appropriately described, namely "BABYLON" and "MOTHER OF HARLOTS". This misrepresentation, is in need of clarifying to encourage others who are caught up in such a lifestyle to overcome as she did as documented in the referenced Footnote. In addition, other details about "understanding" are generally discussed from one perspective as depicted in Footnote1 from the post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES, THE FINALE UPDATED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED,
- subjected the "Chisholm family inclusive" to a bizarre form of outcome, I would like to ask their opinion, but there is no one left to ask (see the post THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED for an avenue/offer implemented for addressing this unfortunate and heinous situation, that some without care or concern for the rights of others utilized as one path to find "ready-made" existences for all those involved in their "free loader's cause" way of life
- used the cover of two sets of badly enacted pieces of legislation of "man's" type, on two different "shores" that included "this" legislative action as well as that described in the post THE PREMISE BEHIND THE "FLAWED" LEGISLATION - UPDATED to in turn find the qualifications, history, accomplishments and identity/heritage (or solid "foundations") as depicted in the post GARBAGE IN, (
SWEET SMELLING ODORS), GARBAGE OUT - UPDATED of an unsuspecting legitimate individual deemed worthy of sacrificing for their cause to provide these "free loaders", ALL with "ORIGIN ISSUES" and possessing only hog structures, ready-made "credentials" acquired by "whatever works" to, cover-up the former actions of "entitled" types as documented in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED no matter the cost, and - relied on spectacular "coincidental" disasters of the type depicted in the post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES - THE FINALE UPDATED (AND EDITED)! (that unspoken "elephant- in- the-room" documented in item # 4 of the listing in the post GARBAGE IN, (
SWEET SMELLING ODORS), GARBAGE OUT - UPDATED) in an attempt to validate and justify, expediently cutting off an individual from his solid "foundations", as discussed in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY, UPDATED AND AMENDED.
However, such CURRENT- DAY events only alter upcoming events but do NOT erase historical facts as documented in the summary Cosvry post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES - THE FINALE UPDATED and supplemented with details from The Finale and Conclusion sections of the post, THE LOOP THAT CAUSED TOO MUCH OF A "GOOD" THING TO GO BAD - UPDATED, as those of the "free loaders cause" and their supporters have mistakenly concluded.
The Finale/Outcome:
As a result, “free-loader cause” types, en masse who are supported unilaterally by entities are now unleashed in society as a result of being granted de facto “1st Amendment free speech rights” as an unintended consequence of this legislation’s overturn and depending on the size of the problem (since only an “omnipotent” power with similar connections really knows for certain how many such individuals are in existence in corporate structures and elsewhere - see the post THE ORIGINS OF "VIRTUAL" "TWO-FACED" IDENTITIES - UPDATED); it’s uncertain how many of these “free-loaders” were “freed” to roam society for those legally with the right to speak, but choosing not to participate in the voting process for one reason or another as well as citizens, to "steal" via any means possible in an attempt to gain something they never had, "credibility", using all forms of unethical methods to attempt to attain their fleeting "legitimacy", [see the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY, THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED generally for examples of the methodology used by such "shadowy free loaders" types) and as specifically described among the examples used in item # 4 of the listing in The Finale/Outcome section of the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING - EDITED AND UPDATED]. Furthermore, see the Conclusion section of the post HOW CAN THERE BE ANY DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE THAT THE STATE OF FINANCIAL FIRMS IS WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE - UPDATED for a discussion assessing the scope of the "free loaders cause" problem.
Personally since I have been surrounded by NOT ONLY specific labels and numbers since entering this State, for, which examples are depicted in the following posts:
- AN EXAMPLE OF HIRING FOR THE PURPOSE OF IDENTITY TRANSFER,
- as well as paragraph 4 of the Here are the Events of Note section of the post ONE TOO MANY COINCIDENCES - THE FINALE UPDATED (AND EDITED)!),
- in addition to the Conclusion section of the post WHAT LESSONS HAVE BEEN LEARNED FROM THE RECENT FINANCIAL CRISIS - UPDATED AND AMENDED; BUT ALSO the many offspring of one specific individual with whom I had developed a professional relationship, who chose to cast their support with those of the "free loaders cause" in practicing nepotism in an unethical and illegal way as described previously and was targeted by and laid off by such also in an unethical and questionable manner to support the arming of those of their cause (see below photo insert as well as the post AN EXAMPLE OF RECONCILIATION - UPDATED) "without origins" with my solid "foundations"*(see Footnote1),
- LEGAL RESIDENTS CHOOSING NON-CITIZENSHIP as well as to those
- IMMIGRANTS CHOOSING CITIZENSHIP BY FOLLOWING THE LEGAL PROCESS and awaiting their turn AS WELL AS
- THOSE ACTUAL CITIZEN(S) WHO STAND UP FOR “REAL” FREEDOM AS THE EARLY "FAIRNESS SEEKERS" DID, WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO, WHICH STARTS WITH DOING WHAT'S RIGHT EVEN THOUGH UNPOPULAR.
WHERE IS THE HUMAN DIGNITY FOR THOSE VOICELESS WHOSE LIVES HAVE BEEN IMPACTED MOST OF THEM BEING THOSE WITH WHOM I EITHER COMMUNICATED OR PERSONALLY INTERACTED (ON A REGULAR BASIS), DURING MY EDUCATIONAL AND EARLY PROFESSIONAL JOURNEY IN THIS "LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE" AS DISCUSSED IN PART IN THE "TO DIGRESS AT THE END OF THIS CONCLUSION" SECTION OF THE POST TO BE (A MOTHER), OR NOT TO BE? THAT IS THE OVERRIDING QUESTION! AND WHOM ARE IN PART LISTED IN THE POST WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED, ALL FOR THE VERY, VERY, VERY WORTHLESS CAUSE OF MAN'S OLDEST "PROFESSION", DISCUSSED ABOVE BY THOSE WHO TOOK ON THE MANTLE OF DETERMINING OUTCOMES FOR OTHERS, AND NEVER KNEW THEY WERE TARGETED AS LISTED IN THE POST WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED ...; REFERENCED ABOVE, HAVING BEEN IMPLEMENTED BY SUCH "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" TYPES WITH NO OBVIOUS REGARD FOR THE LIVES OF THOSE AFFECTED ALONG THE WAY, NOW SILENT, AND MOTIONLESS IN A STATE OF INANIMATE SUSPENSION (AS IF THEY NEVER EVEN EXISTED), A FORM THAT'S COMPARABLE TO THE END STATE OF THE BEASTS OF THE FIELD AS DISCUSSED IN THE CONCLUSION SECTION OF THE POST THOSE WHO WOULD BE god - EDITED AND UPDATED) AND UNABLE TO EVEN CRAWL ONTO ANY "STREET" CORNER AND DO ANYTHING, THAT THOSE "FREE LOADERS" WHO HAVE REPLACED THEM* (SEE FOOTNOTE) CERTAINLY CAN, YET THERE IS NO ONE APPARENTLY WITH THE COURAGE TO RELATE THEIR CAUSE, AS POINTED OUT IN THE FINALE SECTION OF THE POST HONORING GOD AND RESPECTING OTHERS PRACTICALLY - UPDATED, AS REPRESENTED BY THE LISTING THE POST WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED, AS PREVIOUSLY REFERENCED ABOVE?
* FOOTNOTE:
For further discussion about "operation replacement", see The Finale/Outcome section of the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDATED.
* Footnote1:
For an in depth discussion about solid "foundations", see the post GARBAGE IN, (SWEET SMELLING ODORS), GARBAGE OUT - UPDATED
* Footnote2:
On my previous workplace, I had an experience in, which I was literally as well as physically "surrounded" by at least three and possibly many others of the offspring of an individual with whom I had developed a professional relationship, who chose to provide support for those of the "free loaders cause" (as previously described in the post Here are the Background Details section of the post THOSE WHO WOULD BE god - UPDATED AND AMENDED). However, because such are not known outwardly as being inter-related (siblings), it allowed NEPOTISM to be practiced on a grand scale in violation of all types of ethical and legal human resources documented procedures) with the knowledge of possibly only a very select few. Further details are boldly highlighted and documented in the Here are the Background Details section of the post THOSE WHO WOULD BE god - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED), “freedom to speak” as well as in The Finale/Outcome section of this post.* FOOTNOTE:
For further discussion about "operation replacement", see The Finale/Outcome section of the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDATED.
* Footnote1:
For an in depth discussion about solid "foundations", see the post GARBAGE IN, (
* Footnote2:
5 comments:
As the CAREFULLY DESCRIBED CONDITIONS previously outlined in comment # 2 from 4/20/2013 on the COMMENTS Page indicate; competing interests (as challenging as they are), will not be an obstacle to the offer to assist based on the inclusion in the effort of the type of measures depicted in comment # 1 from 4/22/2013 also on the COMMENTS Page to avoid the pitfalls of including expedient decision-making and the perils that result.
When the Constitution is applied in ways the "Framers" did not intend it to be, unintended consequences of unparalleled proportions result, as occurred as a result of the "free speech rights" decision as documented in the post WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK? - UPDATED for the following reasons: 1) entities are operated by individuals collectively, 2) no individual with the legal right to speak had their "rights to speak" denied, 3) collective groups (of individuals) joining together to function/operate as a single entity deserve no "special" rights according to the Constitution (as it was never intended to be used in this manner), 4) when "dual" voices are attributed to selective members of society at the exclusion of others, since a) not all members of society will ever be in positions to be operators of corporate structures and b) opportunity for misapplication and misuse occurs, because it is being assumed that all involved in the running of corporate structures are "legally" entitled to do so and 5) providing legal "rights" to entities collectively with persons included in their ranks, not "legally" permitted, simply allows them to act DICTATORIALLY further compounding the DYNASTIC MONOPOLY status that some of these entities (in the form of the electric utility industry) already possess.
If additional rights are "inferred" in monopolies, to entrench their operating style as dynastic type entities, legal status is ingrained in such entities to act dictatorially and determine who deserves to be possessing what in illegal redistribution schemes to provide those lacking and who knows where such assumption of powers will lead or have led (for example such as the ability to "give" and "end" life as appropriate by allocating identities, accomplishments, qualifications and histories) and have determined in their "all knowing" power to give by decree regardless of whose rights are trampled on, especially now that "coincidentally" there is no longer any talk of electric utility deregulation that by their "good fortune", the September 11, 2001 attacks effectively sent all previous deregulation talk into a quiet grave for burial (not to mention that they occurred also by "odd coincidence", on the 21st anniversary of my acceptance letter at Pratt to complete my engineering studies, to the date. Note: all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.
The question raised at the end of the above post (also included at the conclusion of this comment), will ultimately be addressed when a new pathway/method; implemented by one specially prepared and for whom the mantle is being awaited to move forward in this process, gives a "voice" to the disenfranchised, by being forgotten, "discarded", replaced and ignored etc., which begins with the various steps previously outlined in "freedom all inclusive" as summarized [not necessarily in the order to be followed but listed: as 2), 3), 4), 5), 8) & 9) as documented] in comment # 1 from 6/1/2013 on THIS Page, restated, modified below, as follows:
"Freedom "all inclusive" via the steps outlined in the summary/conclusion of the post THE CONDITIONAL PRICE OF VOLUNTEERING - (UPDATED)! , stated and clarified below, as follows: 2) generic offer to assist those very worthy individuals in need of assisting, 3) specific offer to assist Category of Compliance, et als case specifically, 4) re-emphasizing of directions/instructions to be followed for payment of funds owed by Coke, 5) stressing importance of instituting recommended measures for avoiding reliance on expedient decision-making, 8) highlights the steps to pursue that would clearly demonstrate leadership of the Franklin mold (using a reversal of the static to dynamic method he adopted in, which the chosen location was the static starting point) and 9) another manner for restating # 3 above more clearly that zeroes in on the specific areas in need of addressing to ensure the most effective outcomes for the main/subsidiary turn-around emphasis required; are the clearly outlined measures for the intended approach, namely, to assist the applicable parties in some meaningful way, as a viable alternative, as indicated, addressing various implied details from then to now, appropriately.
This eventuality is awaiting that "remarkable" individual uniquely prepared to follow in the Franklin mold specifically identified, pointed out and outlined in the similarly chosen location where assistance was sought and obtained specifically to address the various specific issues involved in the approach for addressing a scenario in, which a main and one subsidiary is each in need of a different type of turn around, with the specific needs involved included in the selected categorizing arrangement in step # 9 from the above referenced post, being followed for the "big picture view" (clarified in comment # 2 from 6/3/2013 on THIS Page); indicated as needed for achieving similar successes as required, in a reversal of methodology ultimately, (which includes a dynamic to a static method of approach with the chosen location being the static objective instead, for the obvious reasons, namely that a renewal is required similar to what was previously carried out and for such, one must go back to the original situation as in an instance when a bad choice has been made and a repeated return to the starting point is brought about for starting over as outlined in the post WHAT IS YOUR FORK-IN-THE-ROAD SITUATION TODAY?).
The way forward can only be opened by the one unique individual, to be readied for the challenges ahead, taking the F-I-R-S-T step in an on-going process that will lead to: assistance, continued support, turn "arounds", achievements, harmony, unity of purpose, and "the appropriate stamina" outlined to pursue meaningful objectives needed for times such as these!" Note: all links are avilable on the COMMENTS Page.
Post a Comment