WHAT’S GOOD FOR THE GEESE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE WIRELESS “CARNDERS” (EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED 3/18, 4/26,12/2, 12/6 & 12/29/2013 as well as 1/22, 3/3, 3/29 , 5/15, 7/12, 8/17, 8/20, 9/1, 9/6, 9/10, 9/14, 9/18 - 9/20, 9/24 - 9/26 , 11/4, 11/29, 12/2 & 12/4/2014 in addition to 1/21, 1/22, 3/3 & 9/24/2015

Introduction:
Since the financial industry set such a high standard in their targeting of the “offending” Rule that brought them to the brink of insolvency and successfully “crushed” it convincingly, don’t think for a minute that others did not notice that stellar, Oscar worthy performance, and why shouldn’t they? The 8/12/2009 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Publication (B7) described a scenario where it would appear that the parties involved took note of those lessons learned, at least in my opinion.


Here are the Background Details:
The Wireless industry knew that their business was being set aside for review due to the outmoded operating conditions brought about by the technological advancements in their industry, which restricted competitiveness and as a result, regulators and lawmakers began examining issues ranging from exclusive handset deals to text-messaging rates. In preparation, the Wireless “Carnders” giants (who between them have a combined total of 167 million subscribers) and others have been bracing for changes and taking offensive as well as defensive measures just in case they become needed to employ as the Geese (or financial industry) so effectively did. These measures include hiring former aids of a key Senator and of a former Congressional Rep. Between them, these top two (2) Wireless “Carnders” spent $17.5 million in the 1st half of 2009 on lobbying efforts.
As of the time of this article’s publishing, the FCC was getting set to start a broad inquiry into competition in the industry and ordered the industry to examine specific areas ahead of its review with the possibility that more similar areas could be pending. The smaller Wireless “Carnders” hoping for better operating conditions also jumped into the lobbying fest hoping for clearer Rules on the ability of the customers of smaller Wireless “Carnders” to be able to use their product when traveling for services other than voice calls (such as the wireless-data signals used for email and Internet access). The then limitations existed due to the restrictions that existed on data roaming rights, which meant the difference between a competitive versus an uncompetitive product and expensive data-roaming charges or loss of email and wireless web services completely in some areas for consumers.


The Finale/Outcome:
To its credit, one of the two giants of the Wireless “Carnders” was reported to be in talks with smaller “Carnders” in the industry offering some token concessions that had been sought by their smaller rivals. This is at least an example of the spirit of cooperation and token FAIRNESS (of sorts) that should always be taking place, not just in an effort to stave of new more competitive Rule making. IT ONLY GOES TO SHOW THAT AT LEAST A MODICUM OF UNBIASED BEHAVIOR IS POSSIBLE UNDER THE RIGHT CONDITIONS; namely when those elected to represent the interest of ALL the public (as their servants), carry out their functions without regard to status, entitlement, position, resources, etc., and demonstrate that they are capable of acting without regard to the status of those who use such methods as "whatever works"; thus reducing the offices to, which these officeholders were elected to, mere "spectacles" that sway, which ever direction the wind blows from, or is pushed in on occasion as warranted, (even though such types typically consider themselves to be "untouchable"). There is a need for more leaders and/or officeholders of the mold of the "Gipper" who didn't shy away from calling a "spade" as he saw it at the time and place of his choosing. Where is that one (1) with the courage to champion the cause of Lois Bruno of "the Chisholm Family inclusive" at the present time (as the offer in the post "THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED allows for?


The Conclusion: 
Even though dictatorial types may conclude to themselves that:

1. such policymakers can't impact them in any way, they are forgetting that the future is full of uncertainties even with all the resources at their availability, they do NOT know the future, and
2. what appears to be a "bed of roses" today with expedient types waiting to carry out the beck and call of such types in return for "favors", this can all change in an instant under the right conditions where
3. such resources are made of little or no real value, when such types conclude that
4. there is no possible scenario under, which their circumstances could become as the manner described here, every possible situation that could develop has not been dealt with as the case of THE LOOP THAT CAUSED TOO MUCH OF A "GOOD" TO GO BAD - UPDATED, demonstrated.

This is a recent example of a well anticipated activity that all thought was a foregone conclusion and those involved considered would be their moment to "shine", but this was far from what occurred regardless of the reason for its occurrence. The larger point being made is that not every situation can be ruled out even by the most knowledgeable types who are supposed to be experts in their area and who were sure that nothing as mundane as a software loop could bring such embarrassment to their IPO. The same scenario can be applied to any situation, regardless of how well thought out it may appear to be. For example:

• IF POLICYMAKERS SUDDENLY DEVELOP THE COURAGE TO ACT ON THE "SHADOWY FREE LOADER" FINANCIAL SITUATION, THAT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE EVEN IN EXISTENCE AND AS A RESULT IS NONTAXABLE, it would eventually become clear, which entities have been depending on this avenue for their financial "cash cow",
• Those things hidden for some time would eventually come to light, no matter the size of the organization because all those long-standing questions will be finally answered about how those involved really grew into the mega conglomerate entities they did and/or are able to fund ALL their financial obligations because what has been hidden will be realized, who would no longer have this source of UNTAXED income at their availability as generally discussed in the post HOW DO YOU GO FROM SMALL TOWN COUNTRY STORE TO BECOMING THE BIGGEST CORPORATION OF ITS TYPE IN THE WORLD - UPDATED AND AMENDED?, at the expense of the larger society that are forced to pay taxes on their incomes, live from paycheck to paycheck and don't have such a "cash cow" at their availability and
• These types in turn would be forced to answer questions about the sources of steady "unexplained" income that has been supplied by those subjected to living lifestyles dependent on man's oldest profession for those of the "free loaders cause".

As previously pointed out, not every scenario that can occur has been thought through, as this situation just HIGHLIGHTED as well as all those other individuals who knew of my school years but were never identified by me and as a result not necessarily known by those of the "free loaders cause" such as:

1. my "exceptionally determined" acquaintance Elizabeth Ann Tucker who is depicted in the first photo insert in My Photographic Journey, who represents one such example, but who when it mattered most later buckled under pressure from a "benevolent" type entity and "sang" a different song regarding the activities associated with my educational journey that she reconciled when the opportunity presented itself as did my late former colleague Fernando Tabak did when it mattered most as documented in the 1st bulleted example in the Here are the Background Details section of the post WHAT IS HONOR - EDITED AND AMENDED?.  
2. the humble Olivia Gibbons (from a very big extended family tree) as described in the first bulleted listing in the Here are the Background Details section of the post THE CHANGES THAT FOILED THE "BLACKOUT"  - UPDATED AND AMENDED, who represents another and
3. my Management Accounting 201 elective study partner from my final semester at Pratt, the then Janet L. Windus the very skilled fencer as described in the below Transcript excerpt photos. 
4. the listing of all those included in the post SUPPLEMENT TO THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE 1ST ROUND OF CANDIDATES FOR THE APPLICABLE POSITIONS - UPDATED. 



This is an excerpt of my Pratt Transcript with ONLY the final semester's courses shown. 



These three examples above represent scenarios that certainly have not been thought through by these types who ONLY know how to manipulate their "lieutenants" to carry out thuggish behavior and don't realize that as pointed out in the post of the same title, namely, that CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IS NOT THE PATH TO AUTHENTICITY, WHEN THE WILL OF GOD IS INVOLVED - UPDATED. It will be clear when sound principles are applied that some of those "entitled" types and/or entities  who(that) have become the mega dynastic and "entitled" styled entities they have become, could ONLY have achieved such by depending on the UNTAXED INCOME SUPPLIED BY THOSE SUBJECTED TO LIVING DEPENDENT ON MAN'S OLDEST PROFESSION, AS STATED PREVIOUSLY THAT THE "FREE LOADERS" HAVE BECOME DEPENDENT ON THE EXPENSE OF ALL ELSE, as "fictionally" documented in the post HOW DO YOU GO FROM SMALL TOWN COUNTRY STORE TO BECOMING THE BIGGEST CORPORATION OF ITS TYPE IN THE WORLD - UPDATED AND AMENDED? 
Furthermore, all [WHO(THAT) HAVE BECOME DEPENDENT AND/OR HAVE INVESTED IN FEEDING AT THE "TROUGH" OF MAN'S OLDEST "PROFESSION", ENDOWED WITH ITS NEEDED "HEAVENLY" HALO, WHICH SUCH A MODEL  NEEDS TO PRESENT ITSELF AS SOMETHING "CREDIBLE" TO ALL,  AS DOCUMENTED IN THE UNDERLINED DETAILS PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE CONSISTENT WITH MY DECISION... INSERT IN THE HERE ARE THE FACTS SECTION OF THE POST THE HOW TO VIOLATE FERPA AND STILL COMPLY WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED; WHEN NOTHING MORE THAN A HOG MANURE OPERATION SHOWERED WITH PERFUMED SPICES, IN AN ATTEMPT TO TAKE AWAY THE STENCH, WHICH SUCH TYPES "SUBTLE" ADVOCATE (OR ADVERTISE) AS "INNOVATIVE", WERE UNAWARE THAT THE GOD OF CREATION (WHO IS THE ONLY ONE WHO KNOWS THE FUTURE), NOT ONLY WERE AWARE OF BUT ALSO HAD ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE BIBLICAL BOOK OF REVELATION IN CHAPTER 17 AND VERSE 5 SPECIFICALLY, THE TITLES, "...BABYLON..." and "...MOTHER OF HARLOTS...", WHICH THE PRACTITIONERS AND  OF THE ROLE MODEL IN PRINCIPLE OF SUCH AN IMMORAL AND DISHONORABLE ACTIVITY DESERVE TO BE CALLED BY, BUT ALSO OTHER INFORMATION DOWN TO THE MINUTEST DETAIL DOCUMENTED GENERALLY FOR THOSE WITH "UNDERSTANDING".
These modern day "reinventors" of this "innovative" model of man's oldest "profession" have become reliant on ensuring that I am kept in a "standstill" position for the purpose of:

• keeping me in a state of financial "imprisonment", "limitlessly", in order to
• completely taking over my solid "foundations" stolen from the Nationwide Moving and Storage warehouse in Connecticut and elsewhere as documented in the Here are the Facts section of the post HOW TO VIOLATE FERPA AND STILL COMPLY WITH THE INTENT OF THE LAW - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED, supplemented with the details included in the 3rd photo insert (Cedarwood Hills apartment # 111 lease details) in the above referenced post of, which a practical example is demonstrated with the Passport example in Footnote2 of the post WHAT LESSONS HAVE BEEN LEARNED FROM THE RECENT FINANCIAL CRISIS - UPDATED AND AMENDED as well as the comment #1 from 9/8/2015 on the Cosvry Investments 2015 Page and
• attempting to reassign my solid "foundations" to impostors by blatantly acting in DEFIANCE of the Court's ruling while hiding behind their own interpretation of what is an "original" that clearly has been demonstrated to be unfounded when such "claims" are subjected to close scrutiny as documented in the 3rd bulleted listing in the When deals are carried out with paragraph of The Finale/Outcome section as well as in Footnote2 of the post WHAT LESSONS HAVE BEEN LEARNED FROM THE RECENT FINANCIAL CRISIS - UPDATED AND AMENDED.

Who would like to explain this situation to TAXPAYERS WHEN THE NEXT BAILOUT WILL BE REQUIRED, because as pointed out here on the pages of this Blog, REPEATEDLY NOT every scenario that can develop has been thought through by these "free loaders cause" types [such as the scenario described in the below* Footnote regarding the applicability of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)], as well as other scenarios and every potential development never will be? 

* Footnote:
The lack of respect those of the “free loaders cause” have for any form of authority is abundantly clear in their dealings with the postal system as documented in item # 13 of the listing from the post THE “FREE LOADERS CAUSE” “CREDIBILITY”, THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED and is again on display here in a most alarming manner as it been made clear that these types only see such as a hurdle to be circumvented in order to further their main objective, regardless of how it could potentially impact public health and safety.
For example Appendix B to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 50 in its Introduction indicates that every applicant for a permit to operate nuclear facility is required by the provisions of section 50.34 to include in its preliminary safety analysis report a description of the quality assurance (QA) program to be applied to the design, fabrication, construction and testing of the structures, systems and components (SSC) of the facility. Furthermore, the applicant for the operating license is also required to include in its Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) information pertaining to management and administrative controls to be used to assure safe operation. This Appendix also indicates that its requirements apply to ALL activities affecting the safety-related functions of those SSC including:

• designing, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, testing, maintaining, refueling and modifying the facility.

In addition, in section ii it requires that the QA program be carried out for the life of the plant while in section xvii it requires that QA records “BE KEPT AND MAINTAINED TO FURNISH EVIDENCE OF ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY”. This section also indicates that “qualifications of personnel” is such a record that “shall be retrievable” consistent with “applicable regulatory requirements concerning such retention”. To simply “assign” qualifications to individuals who neither possess engineering skills nor are familiar with the difference between Appendices A or K in an environment where such details are critical for safe plant operation during and following an accident where the potential to impact the health and safety of the public is a prime concern, is an abuse of power when placed in the “hands” of dictatorial/monopolistic types. In addition, to act in this manner, namely after ALL the work needed to fix the programmatic criteria exposed by various audits that were a direct result of the fines leveled at the Operators to the tune of $100,000.00 circa 1989/90, was completed, is the height of irresponsibility, regardless of whose support such activities have. These QA requirements regarding ACTUAL retrievable records that are supposed to be maintained for FORTY (40) years after the plant ceases to operate does NOT include:

• anything regarding a “paid” vindictive type witness with “questionable knowledge” of historical FACTS, and only a "sketchy" awareness of current details possessing the willingness merely to repeat whatever is desired “for the cameras”, but instead

actual auditable retrievable records that comply with “applicable regulatory requirements concerning such retention”, which are supported by the historical FACTS (such as being present for example during and following audits, such as I-91-03 and I-93-18 as well as completing the responses required to satisfy previous audit, I-90-12 via documented records with a knowledge of applicable plant installed SSC to be able to furnish evidence of the qualified status of such to satisfy and support such inspections, simultaneously with normal plant operation, refueling and other outages and even when plant modifications are taking place in order to ensure that such activities don’t invalidate the qualified status of the Program SSC), are required. 
If these supporters of such types are able to actually meet these exacting requirements, they MUST be reliant on manufactured (or "duplicitous") records to show that "photoless" "free loaders" (as described in the 2nd bulleted example from the "As demonstrated on pages of these Blogs..." paragraph in the Conclusion section of the post HOW CAN THERE BE ANY DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE THAT THE STATE OF FINANCIAL FIRMS IS WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE - UPDATED AND AMENDED?), were actually performing "credible" functions in nuclear facilities with these stringent quality assurance (QA) requirements, even for Houdini such a feat would be impossible,  because I can and it's NOT dependent on:

1. spectacular disasters of any type,
2. a single "identity crutch", of any type,
3. any paid witnesses,
4. fraudulent documentation and/or records of any type (such as the backdating of records and the illicit manipulating of software code),
5. the demise and/or destruction of any individual with "actual knowledge" of historical events and
6. dual sets of badly implemented and/or misinterpreted legislation on different shores to provide me with history where none exists.

but it was done with the assistance of ONE alone.