Sunday, October 12, 2014

HOW DO U GIVE “GITIMACY” TO FRAUD? - UPDATED 10/2/2014


If u start with a stolen State Tax refund Check,
See the post NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK for additional details.

kidnapped into a “Country Store” cash register’s waiting deck,
The two Transactions representing the waiting Cash Register's Decks Via Which My Two Income Tax Refund Checks, Federal and State Were Cashed. For additional details regarding this activity specifically and filing taxes generally see the post RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD - UPDATED and ADDENDUM TO COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS respectively. 


to ssist impostors with filing gitimate turns without a speck,

first, u have to dclare yourself an riginal* (see Footnote), by heck,

then ensure that maining photoless is the path u select,
and place dfault icons on the Sites of another by code that’s suspect.

J_F_Brazant the default icon that mysteriously appeared to
 imply
 that some other photo less individual made the comments.

Next, jam and steel the phone srvice of another by its neck,

For additional details about the jamming of my phone service see the item # 16 from the listing in the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED
and resort to name alteration* (see Footnote1) through ntworking that’s very direct.
When all these pieces are mplemented down to a peck,

seek an nsurance Provider willing to cover such without respect,

The above caption is highlighted below for better viewing:
None who “legitimacy” is based on the filing of fraudulent insurance claims can are be “agents” of “credibility”: from 1) those who pretended to be others (when the “destruction” to the shed shown in the below photo took place at 8263 140thAve., Olin, IA as end result of a so called “act of god”), in order to receive illicit payout funds, to 2) those entities (organizations) that supported such types as being the legitimate owners of a) the property and b) the authentic policyholders, including 3) the insurance Company that enabled the fraud to take place and now claim to be “on the side” of its policyholders “in the Nation” and 4) this “caper” could not be carried out without the input/involvement of those elected and appointed politico types who eventually devalued ALL the outbuildings on the property at 8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA to a value of “ZERO” consistent with the property assessment for 1999 after having received an assessment in all the prior years from 1991 up through 1998 when a $8,155.00 valuation was assessed (as shown in the below photo). This in my opinion was to cover-up the obvious fraud that had taken place by this“collection” of “free loader cause” types wanting much by doing very, very little that’s meaningful and then allowed a brand new shed to be erected on the nearby property where NONE of its type had existed previously. My protest at this devaluation would have been of no avail, because of my prior experience with protesting a valuation in 1993 that was documented on my written Petition to the Board of Review dated 4/19/1993 and as a result the dye was cast in" "concrete" and I was laid off in March the following year (2002). For additional details about this photo see the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING - EDITED AND UPDATED 

by lligning all those types known to deflect,

anything thical less their actions expose the diskette,

where such have sworn to reflect,
the cause of fictional “claims” much like Shreck

to receive “pay out” support for a stolen check,

that never was theirs, to cover up the deck,

into “whose” coffers such are shown to frolick”,
But who can no longer claim to be non “complicit”!


* Footnote:
See The Finale/Outcome: section of the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED for addition discussion about "free loader cause" originals and their practices.


* Footnote1:
For further discussion on the subject of outright name changing see the 5th bulleted listing in the "Furthermore most claiming..." paragraph of the Conclusion section of the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED - EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED
 

Friday, October 10, 2014

WHEN “CODIFIKAZIONS” AND “REGUGAZIONS” “RUN” FOR COVER!



There is nothing so “imposing”,
As a grand old structure left dozing;
Because is upkeep incorporated alterations too costly to be beholding.
However, ALL allowed “granfazering”,
and concluded, this was the path for this 3rd’s edifice,
about to be humbled by mundane “regugrazions”.
This state of affair lasted for centuries until uncovered by a potential occupant,
who considered a bakery (see below photos) for this noble Brownstone’s “occukazions”,
Preview
Preview
Preview
because such required “modificrazions” for this potential tenant “occutivities”,
and exposed the Owners to costly “alterhazions”,
once “considered” unworthy for this lofty landmark’s “comparzions”,
that all would now be required to follow to meet “codifikazions”.
Therefore, vandalism (see below photo) and “hindergrazions”,

I wonder if these types of incidents that take place are
in any way related to the fact I was a former Employee
of an Entity and its partners who attempted to place "LIMITLESS
RESTRICTIONS" on me, even when no longer
an employee, in a deregulated environment, that never
really materialized, see the below Confidentiality
document as well as the Here are the Background
Details section of the post WHATEVER HAPPENED TO
THOSE SWEEPING CHANGES SUPPOSED TO TAKE
PLACE IN THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY - EDITED
AND UPDATED? for details relating to the electric utility
deregulation that was supposed to occur during or after
the 1990's.

were considered the way to stop this potential client’s profession,
to allow it to die a “natural” death to stop this idea before upsetting this 3rd’s underlying “complizance”,
which never before was a concern, for any in this neighborhood of “fine” Dwellers,
that made ALL now “skeptical” of this one Dweller’s lack of “modifikazion”,
but only whispered to avoid much talk of questionable City rule “brazing”.