Introduction:
On the surface the term “net neutrality” sounds as if it would be associated with actively ensuring “freedom” for some desired agenda. However, when applied to the on-going Internet debate, how can the addition of controls of any type provide “freedom” to a medium, which helped convinced the Courts in the recent “free speech” debate that the cost of speech had already been made so very easily available by its presence, that a relaxation of controls in that case was warranted? This description focuses on attempts to reverse that ruling's premise of easily available speech accessibility by efforts to control a medium by those who disguise their intended purpose. Assumed names and numbers reinvented by those of the "free loader's cause" as a means of demonstrating legitimacy, alone should NEVER an indication of "credibility" (see the posts THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S "VIRTUAL" SOCIETY as well as "VIRTUALS" AND THEIR SELECTION OF LABELS AND NUMBERS). The underlying issues should be thoroughly examined to determine authenticity because issues on the surface can be presented to give the appearance of validity (such as 2 of 15 or even 2 of 12) however, which, may ultimately fall apart under closer examination when it is discovered that in reality there is something missing and not quite right [and instead should be 2 of 16 - see the post THE OUTSPOKEN PEN PAL, WHO BECAME A FRIEND (EDITED W/INSERTS - UPDATED)] as well as THE CHANGES THAT FOILED THE "BLACKOUT" in addition to comment # 1 from 2/13/2014 on the COMMENTS 2014 Page, as well as listing of their methods generally depicting how their "legitimacy" is obtained from the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THIS STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED).
Here are the Background Details:
When the Nation’s highest Court struck down “controls” in that 1st Amendment “free speech” rights debate, based in part on how the relatively inexpensive the costs of speech had been reduced to, enabled by such media as the Internet, a “victory” of sorts was gained for eliminating the “shackles” of controls placed on some to create what was intended to be an “even” playing field for all (see the posts WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK?, WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION (EDITED)? as well as comment # 1 from 1/24/2013 on the COMMENTS Page). In the November 8, 2010 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication, in an article entitled “Net Neutrality” Goes 0 For 95”; the implications for this subject were outlined. The main discussion for this topic was introduced by pointing out that all the candidates who had based their campaigns around the theme of promising to ensure “net neutrality for the entire Internet…” (by introducing more government control), had lost in the then midterm elections. Furthermore, the article pointed out the inverse relationship between regulation and freedom (regardless of the manner in, which it’s disguised), and this Blogger/Artist agrees.
Placing controls on a medium with unlimited potential can be compared to stifling an innovation to protect it from reaching the various possibilities that could be realized from that source. The biggest point in the Internet’s favor is the fact that no existing regulatory agency can quite place this medium under their respective areas of responsibility because it’s a recent phenomenon. However, this has not prevented efforts by some agencies from overreaching and using various “innovative” attempts to usurp de facto authority by various schemes.
The potential possibilities for the Internet are far from over in my opinion, as none of its current “winners” were even predicted to become the consumer favorites they have. Regulatory agencies need not become involved with micro managing the Internet as this medium has already determined its own “winners” and losers and evidence of this abounds.
Conclusion:
Since the number of those unleashed by the pass of "free speech" legislation in need of identities is unknown, as documented in the post WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM THE SPEAK? - UPDATED, the number of those requiring qualifications, accomplishments, identities and the histories of others for their "legitimacy" could be potentially staggering because for example if my specific situation is considered, the number of those with whom I have interacted over the years professionally since graduation is a potentially large number and would be quite a cherry available for the "picking". The replacement of such a number of individuals years after the fact by a "shadowy consuming force" in its "godlike" posture would be quite a well defined total for those who think nothing of the lives and rights of others and no one would ever know the difference if one considered that all in the various departments/business in, which I have worked as well as their connections/extension and in turn their connections/extension, then the number can multiply rapidly as generically documented in the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE! EDITED AND UPDATED and more specifically described in Comment # 1 from 2/13/2014 on the COMMENTS 2014 Page. For those who are in the "business" of wanting much by doing very little such scenarios are ideally tailor made for the type of replacement schemes such unimaginative thugs "dream" for in their shadowy world of monitoring the lives of an unsuspecting individual for the cause of replacement in order that their impostors can be placed in "fictional" positions as CEOs, Directors, high profile "entertainers" and even seeking and in some cases attaining some of the highest political offices and/or their "mates" (as depicted in the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED in addition to The implications/Outcome section of the post "WHEN THINGS COME TOGETHER UNEXPECTEDLY - UPDATED".
When, our society has been reduced to being nothing more than targeting the lives of unsuspecting individuals for the cause of man oldest "profession" for those without skills to further the financial schemes of those wanting much by doing nothing much and in turn for extending their financial "empires" of those "entitled" types documented in the CONCLUSION section of the post THE FATE FOR THE METHODS OF DICTATORS WHO HOLD ON TOO LONG - EDITED AND UPDATED WITH INSERTS; under such circumstances, there is no telling whose identities are being used or misused by whom and exactly how many potential frauds/impostors are in existence in this "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave", as well as elsewhere (based on where the..missing..dots are connected). In this regard, when all the possible combinations are considered and if all those with the potential to be added to the listing of those documented in the partial listing in the post WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED, whose lives were sacrificed (by those who have taken on the IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE mantle of determining the outcomes of others), were actually included, the possibilities would be "limitless". Maybe, from this Blog's awareness, attention can be brought to the cause of those whose lives were impacted by no fault of their own for the reason that were all aware of historical events (in my journey) in this "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" the way they actually occurred and not the manner that they have been reordered to suite those desiring much without doing anything that really meaningful and who are fraudulently living lives of ease in their "two faces", to make it increasingly challenging for these types [with their dual identities (or "two faces") and "qualifications" that are established by: 1) "press releases", 2) newspaper articles and 3) "fictionally" created inserts in books as indications of authenticity, that aren't worth the paper or space they are printed on and/or devoted to them because they can be uncovered under the "right" circumstances no matter how well "woven" they may (outwardly appear to be)] and their supporters to continue to practice their craft, (namely, "earning" patronage dollars to fill the UNTAXED INCOME coffers of their "backers" by any means possible as documented in the "HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION TO THE E-L-E-V-E-N O-T-H-E-R-S P-L-U-S); this would be a fitting conclusion for those lives were so brutally trampled over, because the "legitimacy" of such types is almost always based on the death and "destruction" * (see Footnote) of others, when THE D.O.T.S BETWEEN THOSE SACRIFICED (AND LISTED IN THE POST) WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED AND OTHER(S)ARE(IS) CONNECTED.
* Footnote:
Destruction can be achieved via more than one method, for example, if the reputation of an individual is intentionally destroyed (by the release of false information about the individual, behind his back by expedient types) in order to deny that individual his rights and/or target another individual connected to him and "lay him off" for "trumped up" reasons and by so doing attempt to cover up a host of atrocities carried out for years by those who were permitted to practice such a pattern in the life of an individual in order to provide those wanting much by doing very, very little that's meaningful, and wholesome and upright indeed, by callous, cowardly types who were placed in high office for just such a purpose; then destruction can be achieved by using an alternate method (character assassination through financial imprisonment) and in effect, continue a form of denial of rights by subtle methods while attempting to convey outwardly that such types are interested in doing what's "right" when the opposite is really the case and the typical destructive tactics such types are known for as documented throughout the Pages of this Blog in posts such as THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED; just have not worked, in his case but this pattern continues because those who pursued this path from the outset in the life of one individual for the many "without origins" have no backup plan because they were so sure that their usual methods would continue to work even in the life of His chosen servant without realizing that none can impede the will of God for His (chosen).
On the surface the term “net neutrality” sounds as if it would be associated with actively ensuring “freedom” for some desired agenda. However, when applied to the on-going Internet debate, how can the addition of controls of any type provide “freedom” to a medium, which helped convinced the Courts in the recent “free speech” debate that the cost of speech had already been made so very easily available by its presence, that a relaxation of controls in that case was warranted? This description focuses on attempts to reverse that ruling's premise of easily available speech accessibility by efforts to control a medium by those who disguise their intended purpose. Assumed names and numbers reinvented by those of the "free loader's cause" as a means of demonstrating legitimacy, alone should NEVER an indication of "credibility" (see the posts THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LABELS AND NUMBERS IN TODAY'S "VIRTUAL" SOCIETY as well as "VIRTUALS" AND THEIR SELECTION OF LABELS AND NUMBERS). The underlying issues should be thoroughly examined to determine authenticity because issues on the surface can be presented to give the appearance of validity (such as 2 of 15 or even 2 of 12) however, which, may ultimately fall apart under closer examination when it is discovered that in reality there is something missing and not quite right [and instead should be 2 of 16 - see the post THE OUTSPOKEN PEN PAL, WHO BECAME A FRIEND (EDITED W/INSERTS - UPDATED)] as well as THE CHANGES THAT FOILED THE "BLACKOUT" in addition to comment # 1 from 2/13/2014 on the COMMENTS 2014 Page, as well as listing of their methods generally depicting how their "legitimacy" is obtained from the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THIS STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED).
Here are the Background Details:
When the Nation’s highest Court struck down “controls” in that 1st Amendment “free speech” rights debate, based in part on how the relatively inexpensive the costs of speech had been reduced to, enabled by such media as the Internet, a “victory” of sorts was gained for eliminating the “shackles” of controls placed on some to create what was intended to be an “even” playing field for all (see the posts WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK?, WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION (EDITED)? as well as comment # 1 from 1/24/2013 on the COMMENTS Page). In the November 8, 2010 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication, in an article entitled “Net Neutrality” Goes 0 For 95”; the implications for this subject were outlined. The main discussion for this topic was introduced by pointing out that all the candidates who had based their campaigns around the theme of promising to ensure “net neutrality for the entire Internet…” (by introducing more government control), had lost in the then midterm elections. Furthermore, the article pointed out the inverse relationship between regulation and freedom (regardless of the manner in, which it’s disguised), and this Blogger/Artist agrees.
Placing controls on a medium with unlimited potential can be compared to stifling an innovation to protect it from reaching the various possibilities that could be realized from that source. The biggest point in the Internet’s favor is the fact that no existing regulatory agency can quite place this medium under their respective areas of responsibility because it’s a recent phenomenon. However, this has not prevented efforts by some agencies from overreaching and using various “innovative” attempts to usurp de facto authority by various schemes.
The potential possibilities for the Internet are far from over in my opinion, as none of its current “winners” were even predicted to become the consumer favorites they have. Regulatory agencies need not become involved with micro managing the Internet as this medium has already determined its own “winners” and losers and evidence of this abounds.
Implications and Future Possibilities/Direction:
Regulatory controls should never be used to determine, which applications become the next consumer favorite by attempting to “manage” (or guide the direction) of a medium that is still being innovative. The best use of such resources would be to serve at ensuring that fraud on this medium doesn’t inhibit the attempts by legitimate users whose efforts can be impeded by “shadowy” types mimicking every legitimate action (or attempting to revive every rejected inaction) undertaken by such individuals. In an age when its possible to:
Regulatory controls should never be used to determine, which applications become the next consumer favorite by attempting to “manage” (or guide the direction) of a medium that is still being innovative. The best use of such resources would be to serve at ensuring that fraud on this medium doesn’t inhibit the attempts by legitimate users whose efforts can be impeded by “shadowy” types mimicking every legitimate action (or attempting to revive every rejected inaction) undertaken by such individuals. In an age when its possible to:
- anonymously hold a business (or an individual) hostage to attempt to bring about the desired conditions to demonstrate fleeting "legitimacy" of, which the flaws in such an approach is pointed out in the post WHEN THE LAW TURNS - UPDATED as well as WHEN DISTRESS CONDITIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR AMENDED),
- spoof the identity of another individual in the "blink of an eye" with a click and the passage of flawed "targeted" legislation aimed at transferring the history/identity of an individual to a host of others (see the post THE PREMISE BEHIND THE "FLAWED" LEGISLATION - UPDATED as well as Comment # 1 from 2/13/2014 on the COMMENTS 2014 Page),
- attempt to take over the entire history, accomplishments, qualifications and identity [or solid "foundations" by hiding behind their interpretation of the word "[original]" as documented in the Here are the Issues of Importance as well as The Implications/Outcome of This Action sections of the post THE TWO GREATEST DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GOD'S LAW AND MAN'S - UPDATED] of individual as well as those in his sphere of acquaintance by manipulating current events as outlined in the post HISTORICAL FACTS CANNOT BE ALTERED BY CURRENT EVENTS - UPDATED, while relying on a host of
- "coincidences" that are simply too well ordered and, which in all the cases of the examples used are always seemingly beneficial for the cause of those of those claiming to be "originals", as documented in the Footnote of the post IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS F A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN - UPDATED? to enable them to
- file fraudulent tax returns by outright stealing of a state of IA income tax return check as documented in the Here are the Details of Importance section of the post EXPEDIENTLY TAKING IN IDENTITIES MAY BRING MORE THAN BARGAIN FOR - UPDATED AND AMENDED who
- FEIGN FLEETING "LEGITIMACY" (AND/OR SUPERFICIAL CONNECTION) TO SOME DESIRED OBJECTIVE, BY THE ILLICIT MANIPULATION OF SOFTWARE CODE as documented in the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE - UPDATED as well as in item # 5 from the listing in the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED - EDITED AND UPDATED and
- whose "claim" to be "originals" is checkered with numerous trails of individuals all MISSING WITHOUT A TRACE (a tiny FACT they overlook to tell all to whom they are proclaiming to be "originals") as documented in the Here are the Issues of Importance section of the post THE TWO GREATEST DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GOD'S LAW AND MAN'S.
Freedom of choice on the Internet would be better served by reducing the potential for its misuse (as the following post HOW YOUNG IS TOO YOUNG? depicts, rather than attempting to control its direction by repeatedly disguised counter productive efforts.)
Conclusion:
Since the number of those unleashed by the pass of "free speech" legislation in need of identities is unknown, as documented in the post WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM THE SPEAK? - UPDATED, the number of those requiring qualifications, accomplishments, identities and the histories of others for their "legitimacy" could be potentially staggering because for example if my specific situation is considered, the number of those with whom I have interacted over the years professionally since graduation is a potentially large number and would be quite a cherry available for the "picking". The replacement of such a number of individuals years after the fact by a "shadowy consuming force" in its "godlike" posture would be quite a well defined total for those who think nothing of the lives and rights of others and no one would ever know the difference if one considered that all in the various departments/business in, which I have worked as well as their connections/extension and in turn their connections/extension, then the number can multiply rapidly as generically documented in the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE! EDITED AND UPDATED and more specifically described in Comment # 1 from 2/13/2014 on the COMMENTS 2014 Page. For those who are in the "business" of wanting much by doing very little such scenarios are ideally tailor made for the type of replacement schemes such unimaginative thugs "dream" for in their shadowy world of monitoring the lives of an unsuspecting individual for the cause of replacement in order that their impostors can be placed in "fictional" positions as CEOs, Directors, high profile "entertainers" and even seeking and in some cases attaining some of the highest political offices and/or their "mates" (as depicted in the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED in addition to The implications/Outcome section of the post "WHEN THINGS COME TOGETHER UNEXPECTEDLY - UPDATED".
When, our society has been reduced to being nothing more than targeting the lives of unsuspecting individuals for the cause of man oldest "profession" for those without skills to further the financial schemes of those wanting much by doing nothing much and in turn for extending their financial "empires" of those "entitled" types documented in the CONCLUSION section of the post THE FATE FOR THE METHODS OF DICTATORS WHO HOLD ON TOO LONG - EDITED AND UPDATED WITH INSERTS; under such circumstances, there is no telling whose identities are being used or misused by whom and exactly how many potential frauds/impostors are in existence in this "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave", as well as elsewhere (based on where the..missing..dots are connected). In this regard, when all the possible combinations are considered and if all those with the potential to be added to the listing of those documented in the partial listing in the post WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED, whose lives were sacrificed (by those who have taken on the IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE mantle of determining the outcomes of others), were actually included, the possibilities would be "limitless". Maybe, from this Blog's awareness, attention can be brought to the cause of those whose lives were impacted by no fault of their own for the reason that were all aware of historical events (in my journey) in this "Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" the way they actually occurred and not the manner that they have been reordered to suite those desiring much without doing anything that really meaningful and who are fraudulently living lives of ease in their "two faces", to make it increasingly challenging for these types [with their dual identities (or "two faces") and "qualifications" that are established by: 1) "press releases", 2) newspaper articles and 3) "fictionally" created inserts in books as indications of authenticity, that aren't worth the paper or space they are printed on and/or devoted to them because they can be uncovered under the "right" circumstances no matter how well "woven" they may (outwardly appear to be)] and their supporters to continue to practice their craft, (namely, "earning" patronage dollars to fill the UNTAXED INCOME coffers of their "backers" by any means possible as documented in the "HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION TO THE E-L-E-V-E-N O-T-H-E-R-S P-L-U-S); this would be a fitting conclusion for those lives were so brutally trampled over, because the "legitimacy" of such types is almost always based on the death and "destruction" * (see Footnote) of others, when THE D.O.T.S BETWEEN THOSE SACRIFICED (AND LISTED IN THE POST) WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED AND OTHER(S)ARE(IS) CONNECTED.
* Footnote:
Destruction can be achieved via more than one method, for example, if the reputation of an individual is intentionally destroyed (by the release of false information about the individual, behind his back by expedient types) in order to deny that individual his rights and/or target another individual connected to him and "lay him off" for "trumped up" reasons and by so doing attempt to cover up a host of atrocities carried out for years by those who were permitted to practice such a pattern in the life of an individual in order to provide those wanting much by doing very, very little that's meaningful, and wholesome and upright indeed, by callous, cowardly types who were placed in high office for just such a purpose; then destruction can be achieved by using an alternate method (character assassination through financial imprisonment) and in effect, continue a form of denial of rights by subtle methods while attempting to convey outwardly that such types are interested in doing what's "right" when the opposite is really the case and the typical destructive tactics such types are known for as documented throughout the Pages of this Blog in posts such as THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED; just have not worked, in his case but this pattern continues because those who pursued this path from the outset in the life of one individual for the many "without origins" have no backup plan because they were so sure that their usual methods would continue to work even in the life of His chosen servant without realizing that none can impede the will of God for His (chosen).
No comments:
Post a Comment