Introduction:
It turns out this unlikely scenario isn’t in some Third World Republic or even in some former Socialist State but right here in the U.S.A. where different rules exists for this specific Entity than others in this society. It’s no wonder that such an Entity has come to envision itself as a type of “Arbiter of Thruth” (of sorts). The operating standards of this specific Entity are being examined for a closer view to better enable an understanding of entitlement in the same country that the "Fairness Seekers" thought they had ushered in a new way in a new Land of opportunity a short 230 plus years ago of, which Franklin spoke of as a place you are welcomed for what you can “really” contribute (ethically) in the nation of France in the late 1780s. However, this appears to be no longer the case as such sentiments appear to paid "lip service" to only "for the cameras" because the type of conditions that really exists are these:
Here are the Background Details:
The July 29, 2009 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication (A13) describes this vehicle manufacturer with a name that sounds like Hoard, as One, which remains in the hands of a tightly knit founding family. This state of affairs is a result of a “voting rights act” that allows the family to employ a dictatorial mechanism in, which they only control less than 2% of the outstanding shares (at the time of the article’s publishing), but to control the direction of the Company because of the share value assigned to the shares held by the family. It is true that in a free society one can assign themselves shares to be valued at significantly greater than comparable shares of any other shareholder, (thereby ensuring complete control by a single family perpetually, but is it right and in the best interest of all shareholders?
First of all to justify holding such an unfair advantage, your performance in the running of the Company must ALWAYS be so stellar that not a hint of anything negative should even be associated with your organization and must be repeatedly outperforming other entities of a similar size. Even appeals from public shareholder and corporate governance types have not altered this Entity’s behavior and in 2000 when sitting on approximately $23 billion in cash, it refused to consider share buy-backs typically carried out it such scenarios, because to benefit the family would have had to relinquish its voting stake, (“unthinkable in a dictatorship”). Instead, a gimmick was created to allow shareholders to receive either cash or newly issued shares, which the family could sell and to raise cash without diluting their voting control in this “special dividend”. Even appeals from the powerful pension funds were powerless to stop the maneuver described as an “ominous precedent …to preserve the” (Hoard) “family’s voting power. This state of affairs, with plentiful cash didn’t last long, because it took a beating in the ensuing years as a result of the tire problems it faced.
Recently, in attempting to deal with mounting financial issues a change in leadership of sorts, occurred and a double down posture was assumed (or a roll of the dice in a high states gamble) just ahead of the financial crisis, that a turnaround would eventually occur and everything was mortgaged even the Company emblem (as well as other things they had no right to); in order to raise $23.5 billion to invest in “new cars” in a clever maneuver. While it can claim that it took no financial “bailout” funds from that program by name, it still received $6 billion from the Energy Department for energy “bailout” funds to invest in “green” cars.
The Implications For Hoard’s Future:
The final chapter is not yet written and while this Entity may have kicked the proverbial decision about direction and operating style down the road, with their double down strategy, it still has inefficiencies in its operations that other manufacturers do not have to contend with such as labor that are no longer faced by the others that cannot be ignored forever. At the future time this Entity has extended their decision-making to, with their "legal" debt burden being carried, these types of developments are NOT the type of operating style that still justifies the lopsided value assigned their shares over those of other shareholders and this is very unethical (in my opinion) even for a dictatorially run entity in a “free” society!
Genuine freshness, may result from a change in the corporate governance practice regarding the assignment of its share value and maybe, just maybe freshness will be translated throughout this entity's business structure. How can this entity be considered, the purveyor of anything "fresh", innovative and even going further (or its current boasting "slogan" of being UNSTOPPABLE) with its existing business operating style (unless such slogans are ONLY being used to refer to the "same old, same old", JUST "DRESSED UP" IN NEW ATTIRE?), see the post THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED. As a result, if liberties were not taken with the; identity/heritage, history, accomplishments, qualifications and those in one individual's sphere of influence (to re-create "FICTIONAL INDIVIDUALS" to place in a certain "fictional Mogul's, fictional" empire, supporting those resorting to techniques of the type described generally in the post THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED and more specifically in the examples from the listing, such as # 5 from the listing in the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED, showing DOCUMENTS BACKDATING, AND OTHER HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE UNETHICAL AND/OR DOWN-RIGHT ILLEGAL ACTIONS as documented in the Footnote of THE POST GOD DOES INDEED HONOR THE PRAYERS OF A CARING MOTHER - UPDATED and supplemented by the details in The Conclusion section of the post THE ACQUAINTENCE WHOSE FRIENDSHIP WAS UNEXPECTEDLY CONSISTENT - THE CONCLUSION (UPDATED); which should not have to be relied on by those claiming to be "originals" to provide one example from the post that has now been shown to inconsistent with the historical FACTS. These inconsistencies that are now demonstrated to not be credible with the availability of some of the previously unmentioned plethora of witnesses some of, which are referenced as documented in the WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GEESE... post, indicated in THE ACQUAINTENCE WHOSE FRIENDSHIP... post referenced above. These could not withstand the intense scrutiny to, which they were subjected and as a direct result are now known to be false because those of the "free loader cause" are relying on the solid foundations of another to support the expedient actions of "entitled" types documented in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED in support of activity no one wants to own publicly (when the curtains are slightly drawn back but not too far from the public's eye), to convey the appearance of "legitimacy" such types CLAIM to have in words only by their dictator type and other supporters. However, such is ONLY THE CASE WHEN USING THE IDENTITIES, HISTORIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS (or solid "foundations") as documented in the post GARBAGE IN, (SWEET SMELLI NG ODORS), GARBAGE OUT - UPDATED OF THOSE FROM WHOM SUCH WERE TAKEN. These same dictator types then shield themselves behind Foundations that are only an avenue for NAME PROMOTION as documented in the post A CASE FOR TAX PAYMENT FROM ALL - UPDATED, in their support of such types. If these activities carried out by these "free loaders" were so "credible" and "innovative" and worthy of "going further" by, why would they have to be hidden behind the solid "foundations" of an unsuspecting individual (as documented in The Conclusion section of the posts THOSE WHO WOULD BE "god", - EDITED AND UPDATED and THE STRANGE DEATH OF AN ICON - UPDATED) as well as those in his sphere of acquaintance, who were sacrificed for this cause, (as highlighted in the post WHEN SACRIFICING IS IMPLEMENTED BY DECREE - UPDATED), which may be considered insignificant for some, but tell that to these "notable" individuals who lost their lives for such a worthless activity who never even knew it existed?
All have made mistakes as occurred in this entity's not so distant past when (saddled with manufacturing tire defects that resulted in the loss of many lives associated with one of their then most popular SUV brands in the 1990s) and from that scenario they recovered, after First admitting mistakes were made. This is all that's required here with regard my effort to salvage my unique heritage/identity from misuse, AS SHOWN IN THE PRIMARY EXAMPLE FOR SUCH ABUSE, COMMENT # 1 FROM 6/25/2014 ON THE COMMENTS 2014 PAGE, I will continue (as stated previously)], until change is achieved, and the constant game of attempting to "hide" behind impostors as a means of avoiding the responsible action by acknowledging that these notable identified actually existed and were not allowed to live out their lives to the fullest potential possible as the usually methods no longer work where viable answers are needed to resolve this problem that IS NOT GOING AWAY, regardless of the obvious mismatch in resources and methods employed towards this end.
* FOOTNOTE
THE BELOW EXCERPT IS FROM 7/1/2013 ON THE COMMENTS 2013 PAGE (for consideration here).
It turns out this unlikely scenario isn’t in some Third World Republic or even in some former Socialist State but right here in the U.S.A. where different rules exists for this specific Entity than others in this society. It’s no wonder that such an Entity has come to envision itself as a type of “Arbiter of Thruth” (of sorts). The operating standards of this specific Entity are being examined for a closer view to better enable an understanding of entitlement in the same country that the "Fairness Seekers" thought they had ushered in a new way in a new Land of opportunity a short 230 plus years ago of, which Franklin spoke of as a place you are welcomed for what you can “really” contribute (ethically) in the nation of France in the late 1780s. However, this appears to be no longer the case as such sentiments appear to paid "lip service" to only "for the cameras" because the type of conditions that really exists are these:
- "corporate type free loading activists" (operate openly),
- "shadowy type financial records stealers" (are rampant),
- "questionable business practices/lifestyle choices type exploiters" (are free to target whomever they choose),
- "callous parental types" and
- "generations of skill less and exploited victimized " are in control of this once proud "land of the free and brave"
and has reduced it to a spectacle of the society its Founding Fathers labored tirelessly to hammer out by seeking "creative" ways to return the land they fought to separate back to the same "shackles" that previously enslaved it in the name of greed, perpetual wealth generation and easily obtained accomplishments at a price the society can ill afford to sustain (see the post THE ABSOLUTE MONARCHY REVISITED). This outline describes conditions that should not exist in a free society that counts among its "tenets", a nation with inalienable rights, with liberty and justice for all, but where such words are kicked to the sidelines in name by those who have:
- taken on the mantle of the former colonial masters to take from, redistribute to whom they please,
- exploit the defenseless if so desired,
- steal property and use it without permission with impunity while acting as entitled masters of dynasties irrespective of whose rights are trampled along the way.
Here are the Background Details:
The July 29, 2009 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication (A13) describes this vehicle manufacturer with a name that sounds like Hoard, as One, which remains in the hands of a tightly knit founding family. This state of affairs is a result of a “voting rights act” that allows the family to employ a dictatorial mechanism in, which they only control less than 2% of the outstanding shares (at the time of the article’s publishing), but to control the direction of the Company because of the share value assigned to the shares held by the family. It is true that in a free society one can assign themselves shares to be valued at significantly greater than comparable shares of any other shareholder, (thereby ensuring complete control by a single family perpetually, but is it right and in the best interest of all shareholders?
First of all to justify holding such an unfair advantage, your performance in the running of the Company must ALWAYS be so stellar that not a hint of anything negative should even be associated with your organization and must be repeatedly outperforming other entities of a similar size. Even appeals from public shareholder and corporate governance types have not altered this Entity’s behavior and in 2000 when sitting on approximately $23 billion in cash, it refused to consider share buy-backs typically carried out it such scenarios, because to benefit the family would have had to relinquish its voting stake, (“unthinkable in a dictatorship”). Instead, a gimmick was created to allow shareholders to receive either cash or newly issued shares, which the family could sell and to raise cash without diluting their voting control in this “special dividend”. Even appeals from the powerful pension funds were powerless to stop the maneuver described as an “ominous precedent …to preserve the” (Hoard) “family’s voting power. This state of affairs, with plentiful cash didn’t last long, because it took a beating in the ensuing years as a result of the tire problems it faced.
Recently, in attempting to deal with mounting financial issues a change in leadership of sorts, occurred and a double down posture was assumed (or a roll of the dice in a high states gamble) just ahead of the financial crisis, that a turnaround would eventually occur and everything was mortgaged even the Company emblem (as well as other things they had no right to); in order to raise $23.5 billion to invest in “new cars” in a clever maneuver. While it can claim that it took no financial “bailout” funds from that program by name, it still received $6 billion from the Energy Department for energy “bailout” funds to invest in “green” cars.
The Implications For Hoard’s Future:
The final chapter is not yet written and while this Entity may have kicked the proverbial decision about direction and operating style down the road, with their double down strategy, it still has inefficiencies in its operations that other manufacturers do not have to contend with such as labor that are no longer faced by the others that cannot be ignored forever. At the future time this Entity has extended their decision-making to, with their "legal" debt burden being carried, these types of developments are NOT the type of operating style that still justifies the lopsided value assigned their shares over those of other shareholders and this is very unethical (in my opinion) even for a dictatorially run entity in a “free” society!
Genuine freshness, may result from a change in the corporate governance practice regarding the assignment of its share value and maybe, just maybe freshness will be translated throughout this entity's business structure. How can this entity be considered, the purveyor of anything "fresh", innovative and even going further (or its current boasting "slogan" of being UNSTOPPABLE) with its existing business operating style (unless such slogans are ONLY being used to refer to the "same old, same old", JUST "DRESSED UP" IN NEW ATTIRE?), see the post THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED. As a result, if liberties were not taken with the; identity/heritage, history, accomplishments, qualifications and those in one individual's sphere of influence (to re-create "FICTIONAL INDIVIDUALS" to place in a certain "fictional Mogul's, fictional" empire, supporting those resorting to techniques of the type described generally in the post THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED and more specifically in the examples from the listing, such as # 5 from the listing in the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THEIR STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED, showing DOCUMENTS BACKDATING, AND OTHER HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE UNETHICAL AND/OR DOWN-RIGHT ILLEGAL ACTIONS as documented in the Footnote of THE POST GOD DOES INDEED HONOR THE PRAYERS OF A CARING MOTHER - UPDATED and supplemented by the details in The Conclusion section of the post THE ACQUAINTENCE WHOSE FRIENDSHIP WAS UNEXPECTEDLY CONSISTENT - THE CONCLUSION (UPDATED); which should not have to be relied on by those claiming to be "originals" to provide one example from the post that has now been shown to inconsistent with the historical FACTS. These inconsistencies that are now demonstrated to not be credible with the availability of some of the previously unmentioned plethora of witnesses some of, which are referenced as documented in the WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GEESE... post, indicated in THE ACQUAINTENCE WHOSE FRIENDSHIP... post referenced above. These could not withstand the intense scrutiny to, which they were subjected and as a direct result are now known to be false because those of the "free loader cause" are relying on the solid foundations of another to support the expedient actions of "entitled" types documented in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED in support of activity no one wants to own publicly (when the curtains are slightly drawn back but not too far from the public's eye), to convey the appearance of "legitimacy" such types CLAIM to have in words only by their dictator type and other supporters. However, such is ONLY THE CASE WHEN USING THE IDENTITIES, HISTORIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS (or solid "foundations") as documented in the post GARBAGE IN, (
- MICHELLE HARRIS,
- SIS. HARRIS (MICHELLE & TRACEY'S MOTHER),
- MICHELLE & TRACEY'S OLDER SISTER "TWINKLE",
- AMELIA HENDERSON,
- MARISKA HENDERSON,
- ALBA HENDERSON, (THE MOTHER OF AMELIA & MARISKA),
- BRO. HEDERSON, (THE FATHER OF AMELIA & MARISKA,
- DEIDRE HENDERSON,
- MARTHA HENDERSON (DEIDRE'S MOTHER & BRO. HENDERSON'S SISTER),
- LAQUAVIA BAILEY,
- ANN BAILEY (LAQUAVIA'S MOTHER),
- BARRY HUDSON,
- SIS. HUDSON (BARRY'S MOTHER),
- SIS. KEYES,
- SIS. KEYES'S DAUGHTER & DOCTOR OF MEDICINE) &
- TRACEY HARRIS.
The above represent only a partial listing of those who were impacted who were actually ALIVE and carrying out meaningful activities approximately THIRTY (30) years ago, who or their descendants (if so blessed) could have been the originators of significant achievements IF THEY HAD BEEN ONLY GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY, BUT THEY WERE NEITHER "BLESSED" WITH THE PRIVILEGE OF HAVING OFFSPRING NOR WERE THEY ALLOWED THE CHANCE TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES BY SOME WHO TOOK UPON THEMSELVES THE IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE..." MANTLE OF DETERMINING THEIR OUTCOMES AS DOCUMENTED IN THE CONSERVERY HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION, THAT SOME IN CERTAIN CIRCLES WOULD LIKE ALL TO FORGET AND PRETEND THAT THEY NEVER EXISTED BECAUSE FINANCIAL "EMPIRES" BUILT UP BY SOME AT THEIR EXPENSE (AND HIDDEN BEHIND MORE PAWNs THAN ARE ON A CHESSBOARD), IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THESE "INSIGNIFICANT" INDIVIDUALS (AS DETERMINED BY SOME, (ON THEIR BEHALF), IN COMPLETE CONTRAST TO THE VERY "LOFTY IDEALS" THAT THE "FAIRNESS SEEKERS" HAD IN MIND FOR THIS NEW LAND AS DOCUMENTED IN THE INTRODUCTION). those ACTING IN THIS MANNER OBVIOUSLY THOUGHT IT WAS THEIR RIGHT TO MAKE DECISIONS WITH NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS UNTO THEMSELVES BY "DECREE"* (see Footnote), AS DESCRIBED IN THE "Therefore, the decision of those "entitled" few..." paragraph in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED.
The Conclusion:
One question that is deserving of an answer is, why is there inconsistency between the findings of the FCIC as documented in their Report and the solutions resulting from the financial crisis when a $36 trillion "shadow banking cottage industry" problem remains unaddressed as demonstrated in the Conclusion section of the post WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION - EDITED AND UPDATED? It should be determined if a connection exists between this "shadow banking operation" and the "free loaders" who pay zero taxes un their own identities as documented in the post SUPPLEMENT TO THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - THE ADDENDUM, their main "usefulness", being polished and possessing a willingness to obtain income by any method as documented in The Finale section of the post THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED and who have completely corrupted the uniqueness of this Land now making it impossible to tell who is its real citizenry for impostors when it's considered that this problem that has now existed for approximately 100 years of this unique Nation's approximate 200 plus-year history as specifically discussed in the To digress outline in the Consider the Following Scenario section of the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDAT.
As previously pointed out on the Pages of these Blogs, I will continue to salvage my unique heritage, history, accomplishments and qualifications (or solid "foundations") from the actions of those "entitled" types who obviously were of the opinion that they were endowed with the right to give away this Nation's unique heritage in a desperate attempt to provide a questionable "long-range" income generation means for their business interests as a form of "innovativeness" and then use my solid "foundations" in an effort to cover-up the expedient decision made regarding the Nation's uniqueness that such types simply "gave away" to free loaders cause" types (with their hog "manure" structures); without concern for my rights as an individual as well as the rights of others.The Conclusion:
One question that is deserving of an answer is, why is there inconsistency between the findings of the FCIC as documented in their Report and the solutions resulting from the financial crisis when a $36 trillion "shadow banking cottage industry" problem remains unaddressed as demonstrated in the Conclusion section of the post WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION - EDITED AND UPDATED? It should be determined if a connection exists between this "shadow banking operation" and the "free loaders" who pay zero taxes un their own identities as documented in the post SUPPLEMENT TO THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - THE ADDENDUM, their main "usefulness", being polished and possessing a willingness to obtain income by any method as documented in The Finale section of the post THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED and who have completely corrupted the uniqueness of this Land now making it impossible to tell who is its real citizenry for impostors when it's considered that this problem that has now existed for approximately 100 years of this unique Nation's approximate 200 plus-year history as specifically discussed in the To digress outline in the Consider the Following Scenario section of the post PUTTING ON YOUR BEST FACE - EDITED AND UPDAT.
All have made mistakes as occurred in this entity's not so distant past when (saddled with manufacturing tire defects that resulted in the loss of many lives associated with one of their then most popular SUV brands in the 1990s) and from that scenario they recovered, after First admitting mistakes were made. This is all that's required here with regard my effort to salvage my unique heritage/identity from misuse, AS SHOWN IN THE PRIMARY EXAMPLE FOR SUCH ABUSE, COMMENT # 1 FROM 6/25/2014 ON THE COMMENTS 2014 PAGE, I will continue (as stated previously)], until change is achieved, and the constant game of attempting to "hide" behind impostors as a means of avoiding the responsible action by acknowledging that these notable identified actually existed and were not allowed to live out their lives to the fullest potential possible as the usually methods no longer work where viable answers are needed to resolve this problem that IS NOT GOING AWAY, regardless of the obvious mismatch in resources and methods employed towards this end.
* FOOTNOTE
THE BELOW EXCERPT IS FROM 7/1/2013 ON THE COMMENTS 2013 PAGE (for consideration here).
"I, a simple servant of the 3rd tribe, and Engineer/Hobby Artist/Hobby Blogger, find it astounding to believe that any ethically minded individual or operated entity, etc. can close their eyes to the types of practices described in the post, THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THIS STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED as well as in the post THE METHODS OF "FREE LOADERS" - UPDATED, wear convenient blindfolds to these kinds of grossly unethical and illegal acts, stick their "ethics" in the "proverbial" sand and support these types of highly unethical and grossly unjust (and/or UNFAIR) practices and pretend that such individuals supported by an army of unethical politicos (for various reasons that defy honorably attained "credibility", are "legitimate"). The ONLY thing that makes any sense is that as described in the post AMENDMENT TO THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE, the process previously carried out by agencies of maintaining hereditary records has been usurped by "business interests" and is now operated as a business (ruthlessly in my opinion), and like other "business" operated in this manner, namely, making profit regardless of the price paid as the same post documents, such outcomes are the result. These dictatorial/monopolistic type entities of their communities, are attempting to dictate which skill less "free loader cause" types (willing to achieve much by doing very, very little and more importantly), WILLING TO PAY HANDSOMELY FOR SUCH, should receive the identities, accomplishments, histories and qualifications of those who have achieved by the "LONG (and proper) WAY" of achieving such, namely not by taking short cuts. This cannot be allowed to stand in the face what's honorable and respectful for God and any who claim to be respectful of the rights of others; especially when such are claiming to be supporting representatives of the God of creation, who by their very actions show scant regard for the "heredity's" intrinsic principles, they claim to be theirs. There is no way that those using such methods are the true representatives of a heredity involving "Israel's" 3rd tribe. This is grossly offensive, because it, simply put misrepresents God by those who know practically NOTHING about Him, (who by His understanding created the heavens) by implying that He is imperfect and makes mistakes as we do, this is a very bad and disrespectful representation of our Creator, who, none can fool, regardless of the number of supporters they have and questionably obtained resources at their disposal for their cause, because it's expedient for them to act in such a manner, as documented in the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD ON A SIGNIFICANT SCALE - UPDATED.
2 comments:
Making tough but needed decisions to address "VITAL" issues in any entity/individual where a "turn-around" is needed, can hardly be classified as anything other than such (tough decision-making). On the contrary, dictatorships (as this post points out), tend not to make tough needed decisions but instead "kick them down the road" and focus on "pacifying" the superficial desires of one over and above all else to the detriment of the cause, whether entity or individual, until it's too late. THERE IS A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TOUGH NEEDED DECISION-MAKING AND A DICTATORIAL MODE OF OPERATION!
Post a Comment