Monday, April 1, 2013

THE ORIGINS OF “VIRTUAL” “TWO-FACED” IDENTITIES - (UPDATED AND AMENDED 4/10, 5/11, 5/15 & 6/10/2013 as well as 6/18 & 9/12/2014)

Introduction:
Where did this practice of hiding behind the identity of others (ironically branded with such terms as, “virtual” identities and/or possessing “two faces” needed by “free loaders” as documented on the pages of this Blog’s Pages in posts such as WHO REALLY WAS GRANTED THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK (EDITED)? in addition to ONE TOO MANY “COINCIDENCES” - THE FINALE UPDATED), to achieve “instant” accomplishments and access to “magical” family branches as well as “automatic” financial histories originate? These “Society’s” types are so adept at this that it cannot be new to them, because the techniques used are very well rehearsed. How can a glimpse be obtained into such well-crafted practices by such a secretive collection of thugs, thieves, liars & “stage hands” (or accident "stagers")? This following review will help to shed some light on these questions, as follows.

Here are the Background Details:
To really gain an insight into such techniques that classic by R. L. Stevenson, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde must first be examined, because in this work, the exploits of this individual with “two faces” one good and the other evil are examined in detail to demonstrate how such an existence could be possible, successfully. The modern day “Society’s” types mastered the interpretation of this classic to make it relevant for these times, since the underlying theme in this work is the fact that one of the “faces” must be evil for the other public “face” to be successful. This type of existence, would necessitate the motto adopted by such types, “whatever works”, because covering-up is very cleverly implemented. However, where did the modern day inception of such types blossom, the following is an effort to understand this method of living adopted by some by choice for an easier life and “forced” on others from whom something desired is needed for their existence. For example, those who have usurped the identity of another necessarily have to find a method to “imprison” the individual from whom the identity is taken (with the most likely being the threat of financial obligations). Such threats are meaningless because, the identity absconders have taken flight with the financial history of the individual, therefore, if the history of such has been taken over, how can the individual be threatened with the ability to repay financial obligations that are impossible under the circumstances, which have been placed upon such an individual (a history no longer at his disposal). These are the clever types of methods used by these modern “Society’s” types to achieve their objectives. In addition, if the individual were to move from the location where such types desire such an individual to be to support their existence, (where control can be easily exerted), chaos would result, due to the fact that the identity (ravished for “Society’s” type to survive) would show up being used elsewhere and this must be avoided at all costs.
To find a working example of this “Society” a snapshot of a single insert from the online article about a certain Mogul from January 2000 is examined more closely for any clues. The second paragraph of this article states that this venerable investor, then 69 made his first investment at age 11 and eventually took over a New England based “down-on-its-luck” textile maker in 1965. This would place the occurrence of that memorable event circa 1942 in the middle of WWII (or the year following the USA entry into the war). During the times depicted, life in society was turned upside down, since the able-bodied males were being called up for service and/or away fighting either in Europe or in the Pacific and females were entering the workforce in droves because the able bodied males were involved in the War effort in some manner. Somehow this enterprising young lad of “eleven” “found” the funds, (which were not plentiful during those post “Depression” years (assuming that the U.S.A. was the originating country of this Mogul), that was ended only by the U.S.’s involvement in the War, since salaries were hard to come by). However, the eleven (11) year-old lad had the insight during those “dark” times to “invest” (or purchase stock in very difficult times, documenting two clues in the examination of such types - namely:
  1. their origins are difficulty to quantify to put it mildly and/or are shrouded in mystery as well as
  2. they always appear to be in possession of resources when others are not to be more exact). Maybe a more likely scenario was that this enterprising individual developed “two faces” (or possibly invested in a change in “location”) in order to account for his change in fortunes that enabled him to eventually "take over" a “down-on-its-luck” textile maker in 1965 (the original "distressed condition"  in the life of this Mogul), and turned it into what it is today. This would also help to explain his “love” for mascots with “British” accents as well as similar “free loader” types described earlier.
  3. In addition, the practice of conveniently findingdown-on-their-luckentities is another of the unique features of such types. However, the availability of such assets can only go thus far, after a while there can only be so many “down-on-their-luck” entities or individuals to “salvage”. On the other hand, if a hypothetical scenario is examined in, which the Mogul with the penchant for acquiring such decided to keep up this practice (by bringing about the circumstances needed to place targets in the desired condition), a steady source of “down-on-their-luck” entities could be made available for him to usurp as needed. Finally, this action reveals another aspect of such types,
  4. they always appear to have the "good fortune of being in positions totake oversomething targeted, never are they foundworkingtheir way from the ground up in order to achieve goals and aspirations of their own. And even if suchworking their way up the corporate ladderstories are published, they cannot be substantiated because their “two-faces” needed for legitimacy requires omnipresence elsewhere for their desperately needed “legitimate” identities (see the post WHAT FACTORS ARE NEEDED TO ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT AN INDIVIDUAL CAN HAVE TWO PRINCIPLE RESIDENCES,SIMULTANEOUSLY?). As a result, financial and other crises that “coincidentally” occur either man-made or “naturally” occurring are potentially a windfall for such “mogul types” (see the posts COINCIDENCES AND OTHER THINGS - UPDATED/REVISED as well as WHEN DISTRESSED CONDITIONS ARE ALLOWED TO OCCUR).
These developments described above relate to this Mogul however, if a young lad of 11 found himself in such a situation as previously described, the chances are that this was a process already underway. However, to get a true picture of the origins of this Trojan Horse stealth, wealth generation, very well implemented, managed and controlled shadowy "free loader" placement scheme, a better example would be the account described in comment # 1 from 5/11/2013 on the COMMENTS Page, which indicates that a certain 1936 "abdication" of one supposed monarch on the throne of this former "power" for the "love" of an "American" would probably be the more likely launching or major expansion point. The first question of importance, is whether or not this divorcee was really an "American" or in reality a "free loader plant" or more likely a "free loader sympathizer" type who acted her part who had enough "former empire" connections to carry out her "role" in the entire saga. Most likely, if a plant, her origins will be highly questionable at best if any "believable" information about her can be even discovered, because her role would be the most crucial for this "plot" to succeed. It must be noted for the record that Wikipedia indicates that she has two different birth dates recorded about her, February 19, 1892 and June 19, 1896, which raises many more questions about the real purpose this supposed abdication for the "love" of this twice married divorcee, which "threatened" to destroy the monarchy, in my opinion. Her advance placement and or involvement in this unique Land where all are "supposed" to be legal immigrants would an essential one for this broad based expansion of this stealth scheme to be carried out without the arousing the knowledge and suspicion of any individual, authorities, etc. If, there was indeed a threat to the monarchy. it was not due to the King's affair with this twice married divorcee, but more one of financial implications because of the earlier war (WWI) and the upcoming war with Germany and its potential implications on the institution's (former "empire") survival that probably required a major expansion of an effort already in place to ensure a steady stream of financing for whatever military involvement was likely to occur as a result of Hitler's antics. What resulted is what is in existence today, namely one of the most successful operations carried out by one ("friendly") Nation against another to share in the Country's prosperity when it became clear at the dawn of the industrial revolution that it was destined to become powerful and the former defeated "empire" would be excluded from such a revenue source. This topic is further discussed in the Here are Selected Examples for Consideration section of the post AT WHAT PRICE LOYALTY - UPDATED AND AMENDED. Its placement was so well woven behind the solid "foundations" of an unsuspecting individual, that it took his newly adopted practice of documenting his historical/educational journey in the new Country he entered to carry out and complete his educational aspirations and then professional experience, to reveal the practices of the "stealth", wealth generating scheme, that in reality was a modern day version of a centuries old practice of hiding the most disdainful method of man's oldest "profession" behind the solemnly clothed cause of the most "High". These actions were enacted for the purpose of adding "respectability" to this most demoralizing activity for the perils and price paid by those affected by the types of methods used by such types such as those towhich my late uncle Chris and his extensive family were subjected to since his family's whereabouts are now questionable [as last reports had my "dear" Sister "inheriting" his property as documented in item # 6 of the listing in the "This is the Outline of the Methods Used" section of the post THE FATE FOR THE METHODS OF DICTATORS WHO HOLD ON TOO LONG (EDITED/UPDATED AND AMENDED]. 
The result of this activity, is that at present, the unsuspecting Nation's commerce and political centers are so infiltrated with these "free loader" and "free loader-related" types that are collectively known as "free loader's cause" types, and there is no real telling who is really legitimate and who is not anymore, due to the sheer sophistication and diabolical methods of the replacement techniques used as demonstrated in the cause of the "Chisholm family inclusive" for example as documented in the Here are the Background Details and The Implications and Outcome sections of the post IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAY AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN -  UPDATED)? 

The Implications and Future Outlook:
It must be also pointed out that not all “down-on-their-luck” scenarios may be noticeable, some may be figurative and/or more subtle in nature, which those in need of being rescued would be gladly willing to do whatever their “white knight” desired to avoid disaster. Either way the objective will be achieved, namely acquisition of something targeted about an entity or individual(s) that is deemed critical for the “empire” of the hypothetical Mogul (see the below inserted description for an arbitrary comparison to demonstrate at the time why Conservery was deserving of investment funds). 

This is an Argument for Conservery Investment Developed in 2007 to differentiate the two Business entities Conservery & BHI, in order to show why one was more deserving of investment funding than the other based purely on business ethical conduct! 

 
So far the characteristics observed about such "two-faced" types in this observational description are as follows:
  • their origins are very, very difficult to quantify and are downright shrouded in mystery,
  • they appear to be always in possession of resources, even when conditions exists that such are difficult to obtain, for most others,
  • they have a unique ability to be able to "find" "distressed targets" worth investing in and
  • they always appear to be in a position to "take over" some targeted prize, never working their way up or starting anything from ground up.  
Furthermore, an examination of the "parent" company of the Mogul used in the above comparison, (which took over the Iowa based electric utility entity in the mid '90), was then known for:
  1. permitting its stock price to rise prohibitively high that at the time of the comparison's writing, appeared to  exclude most from being able to afford these shares while not paying dividends or utilizing stock splits,
  2. showing scant regard for effective corporate governance and is effectively managed like a dictatorship as no “viable” long-term succession planning is definitively published and/or followed (see the post “DICTATORIAL STYLE OR NOT (EDITED)?”), effectively “kicking such planning down the road”,
  3. part of his business interests (listed in the above paragraph) is known for using harassment (see the post THE TIME HAS COME),
  4. the Mogul is known for using the ideas of others and not reimbursing thelegitimateOwner of the material for such material (see the post THE ONE THAT WAS OVERLOOKED , OR WAS IT - EDITED AND UPDATED?) and
  5. using advertising slogans as a business tool to attempt to cover-up wrong-doing (in my opinion) as some would like to think (but it does not), whether it’s “banking on degrees”, “chartings cover” or “the (not so) real thing”, if wrong-doing is being covered-up, it must be addressed sooner or later.
On occasion, such issues do come to light, whether sooner and at other times its later, but regardless of the duration, it cannot be swept under the table whether its singling out one to receivespecial treatmentto enable a one time construction contractor (who was once my Uncle Chris’ main competition) to open and become a boutique styled marina hotelmagnate”, type developer, when other more critical types of investment, more beneficial to the typical populace of the Country’s Second Town are direly needed or stealing the ideas of another business interest and not paying for it for approximately ten (10) plus years as would be expected in a society that is not a dictatorship and not acting “godlike” by determining who is deserving of their own identity and/or who should it be awarded to, (see the posts ADVERTISING’S TRUE PURPOSE - UPDATED as well as TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW MR. BUFFETT (EDITED 2/26/2013 & UPDATED 3/242013) in addition to WHAT REALLY IS UNDERSTANDING - THE ADDENDUM).         

The Conclusion:
In the end, it must be remembered that not all situations can be disrespected, taken over and covered-up as worthless because any Mogul (with "two faces") wishes, as his infamous steak (or hamburger) lunches have become known for as documented in the post ETHICAL TREATMENT OF OTHERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE PRACTICED (EDITED 3/17/2013). In the end, even the most entrenched dictators all end up in the same manner, as the recent case of Mubarak so clearly exemplified because he chose to take another chance and wished that his thugs could pull off a last minute “miracle in the streets”. As history revealed, that did not work, just as the long standing debt has to be and will eventually be paid it rightful owner, there are no miracles to be pulled out and those who use “back door” threats of targeted “third-party” action, hiding behind institutions not to carry out their fiduciary responsibilities to cover-up past unethical practices and even the shenanigans of opportunistic politico types can't prevent this eventuality, because none can impede the will of God for His chosen.
However, it was the availability of my historical records in the CT storage warehouse that brought about another critical juncture for this "Shadowy Consuming Force" where a decision of one type or another was needed and on this occasion as prior, however on this occasion others had to be brought into the "cash cow" and another major expansion undertaken at my expense took place as documented in the second part of comment # 1 from 6/9/2013 on the COMMENTS Page by those with no imagination but for easily availability of funds with no thought for the long-term ramifications of their actions. However, all will have to be stand and be counted for their actions like responsible “corporate” structures they are supposed to be sooner or later; respecting all not just the few at the expense of the many and for “collective” courage on the part of those who have found themselves called to their unique roles as standard bearers at these times (as documented in the post EXAMPLES OF COURAGE - AMENDED & EDITED), for it is times such as these that our real courage is tested and how we proceed will determine whether examples such as this Nation’s 40th President (R. Regan) and the Nation of Barbados’ 1st Prime Minister E. Barrow are followed in order that what's due all that is a basic right (EVEN FOR THE DEPARTED) will finally be achieved, as called for in The Conclusion section of the post THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED while charting a new course, instead of more of the same and those not capable of joining in the collective stands being taken (for one reason or another) should stand down and permit others less burdened by past actions to take up the mantle for broader-based improvements to be finally attained, benefiting the majority instead of the few. The real important question are there any left who can carry out such a mandate unimpeded in light of the extensive infiltration of the unsuspecting Nation's affairs by the former "empire" "free loader cause" types who have not been so hampered as to render any attempt meaningless and a mere cover-up from the outset? 

No comments: