Saturday, March 9, 2013

THE TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW, MR. BUFFETT (EDITED/UPDATED W/INSTRUCTIONS AND AMENDED) (2/26, 3/15, 3/17, 3/27, 3/30, 4/26, 5/20, 7/17, 7/18, 7/20, 7/21, 8/8, 8/28, 10/26, 11/22, 12/2, 12/6, 12/8 & 12/30/2013 as well as 1/21, 1/24, 2/14, 2/15, 2/19, 2/21, 3/14, 4/20 ,4/22 & 7/23/2014 in addition to 10/24 & 10/26/2015

 
Please note: this post has been replaced by THE TIME FOR THE "OVERLOOKED" PAYMENT IS HERE, MR BUFFETT - EDITED as the central location for details about this subject from a "big picture" perspective ONLY, for a more narrowly focused viewpoint, such details are considered here.
 
 

Introduction:
The previous post TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW MR. BUFFETT, (EDITED 2/26/2013) has been updated to add a conclusion section, to adequately address all the outstanding issues appropriately as well as amended to demonstrate that those with biased outlooks are unreliable for making determinations where a much broader viewpoint is essential and required [see the post WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GEESE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE WIRELESS CARNDERS (EDITED), for a discussion about the conditions under, which unbiased behavior is possible even from those biased types] that this post is being updated to include one such that most today (such as the "free loaders cause" types and their supporters) have never been exposed to or experienced in their lifetimes.
 
Background Details:
When the Root Cause material below, Facsimile Transmittal from 9/9/2003 and the accompanying Conservery Root Cause Flowchart (Example), were faxed to BHI on September 9, 2003 (photos included below),

 




 
There is no need for perjured testimony from any individual vouching for the validity of any individuals when such individuals were not involved in anyway, shape or form. The facts including the times of occurrence 11:11 and 12:23 "speak" for themselves, they need no interpreter!

FURTHERMORE, PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS INFORMATION IS INCLUDED FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES ONLY, AS THIS PHONE AND FAX NUMBER IS NO LONGER IN ANYWAY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPRIETORSHIP AS DOCUMENTED IN THE POST CONSERVERY FINAL STATUS UPDATE REGARDING STATE CRITERION - AMENDED - (EDITED 3/5/2013).


To Digress:
SOME ARE EVEN NOW ATTEMPTING TO "WHIMSICALLY SUGGEST ALL TYPES OF THINGS THAT AMOUNT TO UTTER NONSENSE BECAUSE A SINGLE ADDRESS AND ASSOCIATED DETAILS CANNOT BE ASSIGNED TO MULTIPLE, INDIVIDUALS IN ALL CORNERS OF THE GLOBE ALL SIMPLY IN SEARCH OF LEGAL PATHWAYS INTO THIS COUNTRY TO EARN INCOME AND SOLID FOUNDATIONS THE EASY WAY AS DOCUMENTED IN "...the "red carpet" treatment Lois Bruno and her family welcomed me..." sentence in The Implications/Outcome section of the post WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION - EDITED AND UPDATED, which is supplemented by the fictionally described details included under "...the  IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE role of determining outcomes for others..." discussion in the CONSERVERY "HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION that only sadly reveals WHAT LENGTHS SOME WILL GO TO OBTAIN THEIR OBJECTIVES THE "EASY WAY", WHO ARE HAVE OBVIOUSLY DELUDED THEMSELVES INTO BELIEVING THAT THE DEATH AND DESTRUCTION OF MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS (AS THE PARTIAL LISTING IN THE "Genuine freshness may result..." paragraph in The Implications for Hoard's Future section of the post HOW CAN A BUSINESS BE OPERATED LIKE A DICTATORSHIP IN A FREE SOCIETY - EDITED AND UPDATED? depicts is EASY, because it enables them to avoid payment of legitimate debts. However, as the events surrounding these developments have revealed, the recording of history via two (2) different methods have made such a premise an absolutely false foundation on, which to base the new reality such have built up "empires" on, which are only as strong as their weakest link. If my opinion wee asked, I would have unformed these types to seek elsewhere for erecting such, especially those who would prefer their dealings to be carried out more discreetly.


To Resume:   
The material depicted was submitted at the above
indicated times (11:11 and 12:23) with the understanding that if there were interest, follow-up contact would be made with me at Conservery. Yet in spite of the fact that no such contact was made, the material was used without permission by that 125 plus year Institution, Coca Cola as was documented in the September 16, 2003 edition of that Daily/Weekend Business Street Publication and included under documents assembled below with the caption “Questionable Use Of Conservery Material?”, following the “three (3) overlapping Causal Factors” representing the elimination of redundant decision-making centers into the one (1) central authority entity, as depicted in Conservery's Root Cause format was CLEARLY AND IRREVOCABLY copied and used in an article entitled "COKE TO REVIEW U.S. MEDIA ACCOUNTS”, with the following subheading "TO TRIM MARKETING COSTS, PLANING, BUYING SHOPS WILL GO FROM THREE TO ONE" as this principal demonstrated below pictorially, indicates  IN ONE INSTANCE AND SUBSEQUENTLY IN ANOTHER as specifically described after the three (3) photo inserts included in the Background Details section of the post TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW MR. BUFETT - EDITED AND UPDATED.

 


The Conservery root cause principal revealed that the causal factors for the unclear lines of responsibility was the overlapping decision-making assigned to various departments over the years and recommended the elimination of this redundancy (namely, multiple departments with the same responsibility), in order to speed decision-making and eliminate excessive costs as the Coke plan three-to-one plan copied (in my opinion) and stated by the soft drink giant (in the referenced article) was intended to do. If there wasn't unauthorized use here, there would be no need to OVERLOOK ADVERTISING as a bona fide area for making significant strides and be included among the years top ten (10) as documented in the list of KNOWN FACTS identified specifically as nos. 5 - 7 in the post THE ONE THAT WAS OVERLOOKED, OR WAS IT (EDITED AND UPDATED)?  
 
The Finale:
This course of action has been previously posted under the heading Breakdown of Fees Owed Conservery; however, it is being included again below for efficiency with regards the access of all relevant details:

BREAKDOWN OF COMPENSATION OWED CONSERVERY FOR USE OF ITS ROOT CAUSE MATERIAL BY COKE

The amount owed is based on a percentage of the savings realized, or 15% of what was realized as a result of going from three (3) agencies to one (1) agency.
In addition, the news article indicated that Coke was on track to spend approximately $275,000,000.00 on advertising for the year 2003.
Therefore, if Coke ad costs dropped from $275,000,000.00 to approximately $230,000,000.00, realizing a total of $45,000,000.00 in savings, (which can be verified), Conservery is owed $45,000,000.00 x 15%
Or approximately $6,750,000.00.

In addition, since payment has been owed since 2003 a duration of 10 years, approximately, a 3% annual interest fee is being applied.
As a result, this totals $6,750,000.00 x 3%,
Or approximately $202,500.00 and over the course of the 10 years, this has now reached $2,025,000.00

Furthermore, since this debt has not been paid since now for a total of 3, 937 days (or 167 days past the ten year mark as of 2/15/2014 for, which this penalty was calculated, this 3% penalty over this duration of approximately 0.458 years past the 10 year period shown above amounts to:

$2,117,745 for a grand total of:

$6,750,000.00 + $2,117,745



= $8,867,745
This in my updated estimation is a fair approximation of what is owed me as this debt is now in its 11th year, based on my conclusions drawn, however this is a matter of fairness to settle the on-going saga as this should not be dragged any further into this eleventh year (2014).


James F. Bryant
Founder/Owner
Conservery
February 15, 2014



The Outcome:
For example, if I had made the decision to use the services of one of the fractional Air travel providers seriously examined, such as Flexjet or the Netjets division of BHI, which has been marketed to me here over the years, see included examples below; how could I request a



 
My initial inquiry at Netjets never discussed any shorter distance and/or in-state traveling as this correspondence suggests.
fractional ownership [in any entity without making any contribution (payment) of any kind], and instead decided to argue why I was deserving of the fractional ownership without making any payment even though avenues were made through, which that information could be obtained if needed, but I ignored it and continued to make my case for the use without due consideration for the price available. Wouldn’t that make me irresponsible and “a sleazy” type of individual, trying to obtain a service without making any payment at all. Just as for such behavior I would be deserving of such a title, how much less would the application of a similar title be applied to you (Mr. Buffett), who acted as documented in the Background Details section. The time to acthonorablyis now and end this sad spectacle, because regardless of how the communication is addressed here, there is just One (1) James F. Brazant (or James Brazant) and there will always be only One, (who is not being defined simply because of where this Proprietorship was initiated, it's a little too late for identity games to avoid payment and demonstrate that even you can do the right thing when faced with the facts (even when they were not the facts you preferred), after all this is only a matter of FAIRNESS. Please pay the amount due above!
However, to the contrary, if reliance on the "identity games" previously mentioned is still being relied on to credit "shadowy" type individuals as being "legitimate" and somehow "coincidentally" miraculously are responsible for my ideas; then serious unanswered questions need to be addressed, to use this path to avoid meeting the due obligation, in addition to the question raised in the last sentence in the 4th bulleted highlighted insert included after the three photo inserts in The implications/Outcome section of the post WHAT STOPPED A CHAMPION - EDITED AND UPDATED, as well as the question raised in the "When it comes to the matter of Conservery's long awaited overdue debt..." in The Reality of Living With an Awesome Reputation section of the post FINDING CONTRIBUTORS FOR A MOGUL'S CHARITY - UPDATED, the following also require addressing:
  1. how did the NOTARIZED LETTER DESCRIBING HOW MY PERSONAL BELONGINGS WERE NEVER RECOVERED FROM THE CONNECTICUT STORAGE WAREHOUSE included in the application for my replacement passport in 2001 ended up being returned to me in the envelope in, which the Passport was included ostensibly from the Barbados Consulate in New York (as documented in the post THE PREMISE BEHIND THE "FLAWED" LEGISLATION - UPDATED)? and
  2. how did an exactly similar situation "coincidentally" managed to occur when my communication to the Social Security Office was mailed in 2005 to correct the replacement Social Security card issued in, New York in 1991 and documented in item # 13 of the listing from the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "LEGITIMACY", THIS STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED, which has made it clear that this avenue (crediting "shadowy" type individuals as being "legitimate" and mysteriously responsible for my ideas), is NO LONGER AN OPTION, because its validity has been exposed for the highly unethical "sham" that it is deserving to be called being as well as their "fictional" links to the land of my birth and citizenship, as well as heritage "magically" created by expedient political types out of thin air that would ONLY be accepted as valid by those without standards?
Furthermore, to compound the above questionable developments is the "stealing" of my State of IA income tax return for the purpose filing of fraudulent tax returns in my identity as documented in # 11 of the listing from the post THE "FREE LOADERS CAUSE" "CREDIBILITY", THIS STORY IS NOW TOLD - UPDATED, by these obvious impostors who have to rely on stealing in ANY form to permit the filing of taxes "legally", is a representation of non-existent "credibility", which also can no longer be relied on to keep this farce alive because such "identity crutches" are no longer a viable option for those with origin issues and obvious lacking "legitimacy" to be upheld as examples of "credibility", for the obvious reasons - as these methods A-L-L show those that lack authenticity, but we keep ending up at this point where these "easily" obtain "credibility" types, and their supporters who rely on their unethical tactics and conclude that this is how matters will end, but such is not the case, as we will end up at this same point again and aging and again until this matter is addressed, fairly Mr. Buffett. PLEASE BRING AN END TO THIS SAD SPECTACLE AND ALLOW THE DEBT TO BE PAID TO ITS RIGHTFUL OWNER IN ORDER THAT ALL CAN MOVE FORWARD FROM THIS RIDICULOUS MATTER.


The Conclusion:
THE FOUR (4) QUESTIONS INDICATED IN THE FINALE SECTION AS NUMBERED HIGHLIGHTS [OF, WHICH TWO (2) OF THE FOUR (4) CASES ARE INCLUDED ABOVE]; ALL REQUIRE MEANINGFUL ANSWERS TO KEEP UP THE IDENTITY CHARADE THAT HAS BEEN TAKING PLACE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF THE LEGITIMATE DEBT DOCUMENTED ON THE PAGES OF THIS BLOG, BECAUSE NO INDIVIDUAL OF SOUND PRINCIPLES WOULD ACCEPT SUCH AS CREDIBLE TO AVOID A DEBT ANOTHER OWED THESE SAME INDIVIDUALS EXPECIALLY IN THE LIGHT OF THE HISTORICAL FACTS REVEALED IN THE CONSERVERY "HOLDING BASE" HEADER (PHOTO) EXPLANATION. AS A RESULT, I'M ONLY REQUESTING TO BE TREATED WITH THE SAME RESPECT AS YOU WOULD LIKE OTHERS TO TREAT YOU, WHO WOULD EVEN DARE TO OWED YOU ANY DEBT. THE PAGES OF THESE BLOGS WILL REFLECT THE RECEIPT OF THE PAYMENT, ACCORDINGLY, WHEN COMPLETEDTHERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT AS AN INDICATION OF SUCCESSFUL PAYMENT OF THIS DEBT.
  

 

James F. Brazant
Proprietor
July 23, 2014



27 comments:

J_F_Brazant said...

This is not the time for relying on identity crutches as documented in the post “HOW THE RECORDING OF MY JOURNEY SAVED THE DAY!” (link on COMMENTS Page), where business entities make quid pro quo arrangements in exchange for permitting impostors to participate in practices such as “FREQUENTING PAST ESTABLISHMMENTS AS A MARK 0F LEGITIMACY - UPDATED” (link on COMMENTS page) by either reopening old accounts of others by impostors in “fictional identities” or paying off a small balance of an old account from others and by so doing enable frauds to walk away in their new found identities. Owning up to your responsibilities incurred when the ideas of another was used without permission is the way forward, not more of the same to demonstrate, “awesomeness” to those cheering on the sidelines only seeking favors, (and repeating what they think you want to hear, without stopping to inform you how disgraceful such practices really look to those onlookers who are not fooled by the smoke and mirrors games being attempted by “slight of hand” methods). Just step back and see that the same cheering onlookers repeating “give him the shaft” won’t even donate to your charities, where they also allow you to make a spectacle of yourself “in search of donors”; but are only encouraging you to keep on that same track making a spectacle of yourself again and again and aging until they will wrest the entire empire away from you using your same methods employed on others! You don’t have too prove you’re awesome with me in my case for fairness, save that for your complicated “deal-making” where you my really need to. Food for thought, Mr. B.!

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

My reason for placing the concerns I had about those who would go to any length to achieve their end (or who live by “whatever works”) in this updated post in a Conclusion section and provided the U.S. Postal Service concerns “flags” or examples depicted, was to make the Entity and its main Backer who owed the funds to my Proprietorship stop an think about using such a pathway. For these types are not only fearless when it comes to showing disrespect for the “venerable” postal mailing service, but also are disrespectful of the banking system as they used their networking ability to BOLDLY steal my State of Iowa, Tax Refund Check (see the posts NOTICE OF STOLEN CHECK as well as RECORDS MANIPULATION TO SUPPORT ID FRAUD UPDATED/AMENDED - links on COMMENTS Page). Furthermore, if in spite of the “red flags” (or warnings) raised such a path was used to forward the funds owed, I am stating for the record, the payment did not reach here at 8263 140th Ave, Olin, IA 52320-7708 and I am recommending that Coca Cola and its main Backer issue a stop payment order against the check in the interest of their Company’s reputation in supporting unsavory types, with scant regard for the rights of others, in their activities, (unless it was this “storied” Institution and Backer’s intent to support such types all along, and I would like to think that such was most definitely not the case). In addition, if any politico type person is casting their reputation in with those using such methods, this should speak volumes about the character of such individuals, and there is not much more to be said in this regard! THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENSURING THAT THE PAYMENT IS RECEIVED IS STATED IN THIS UPDATED POST WITH RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ALSO INCLUDE MARKERS to ensure that those with the resources to implement all type of unethical actions aren’t circumventing this method as well. PLEASE FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPLICABLE MARKERS CAREFULLY!
James F. Brazant
Founder/Owner
Conservery

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

This year I have yet to see my Pratt Alumni Association Card for 2013, as in previous years. If the cards have been mailed, chances are that it was finally stolen as was intended by the annual updates and whoever absconded with the card also was used as a ploy to steal the Coca Cola payment assuming that it was mailed and also for the filing of taxes illegally in my name, WHICH I HAVE YET TO DO FOR TAX YEAR 2012, BY DESIGN. Therefore, phone call games to permit mail diversion of illegal tax returns is NOT the answer to "credibility" and yes Mr. Buffett, Coca Cola still owes me the funds for use of my ideas without permission as hiding behind impostors don't count for charities or for payment of a legitimate debt!

James F. Brazant
Founder/Owner
Conservery

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

As pointed out in the previous comment from 4/6/2013, my taxes were not filed yet by design as I do NOT have to follow the same method followed in 2012 because of certain circumstances relating to the injuries sustained by my eldest daughter to file repeatedly in the same manner and more importantly, I do not owe any taxes. Those "shadowy types" requiring identity crutches, need to rely on the "legitimacy" of another to illegally file taxes by attempting to assume the identity of someone else. Therefore, my decision not to proceed in this manner was by design as previously stated to avoid following any pattern to provide those relying on "checkbook legitimacy" a mechanism for following to demonstrate their non-existent "credibility" annually.
In the matter of the Alumni card, just as the "previously available" student Alumni Card (on the School Website), was never downloaded by me (and another requested since the card posted for download on the School Website can be applied to anyone claiming to be a James Brazant, as it done so in this manner) and my school records were listed in my full legal name and at a minimum should be continued for consistency and to avoid misinterpretation. The requested card being mailed with my middle initial at a minimum and should be received by this weekend or early next week.WHEN THE CARD IS RECEIVED, IT WILL BE ANNOUNCED HERE!

J_F_Brazant said...

Such actions as documenting the receipt of materials requested as will be carried out in this post for the receipt of my own school alumni card are sadly needed due well equipped army of useless, skill less, and shameless free loaders unleashed in this Country by selfish former Colonial power types and others with a desire to be NUMERO UNO AT ALL COSTS using it as their Trojan Horse “cash cow” illegally for years, who use methods such as diverting insurance receipts to justify stealing anything and everything connected to an individual whose life and qualifications have been targeted in a well coordinated, illegal pyramid scheme that ply on the qualifications of unsuspecting types who have achieved significant undertakings with the remotest connection to the former “power” who see such as their property to use as they see fit by their form of “checkbook legitimacy”, regardless of the upheaval in the lives of those targeted and any collateral damage connection who stand in their way of implementing their “instant” qualifications method on the backs of those who have attained much, are then sacrificed, for their achievements, which they can then distribute among such types in their quest to achieve much by doing very little to carry on with their well coordinated and supported by the former such types who act in unison just as the former colonists did in opposing them but in reverse action to sacrifice any and everyone who opposes their methods a cause, which has been made mine to sound the “battle cry” against due to the ravishing and destruction carried out in my life and those acquaintances seen as worth nothing more than being sacrificial fodder as documented in the posts IS “THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHARIMAN?”, as well as “THOSE WHO WOULD BE god!” in addition to “THE LAUNCHING OF THE INITIAL CONSERVERY WEBSITE - UPDATED” and "NUMBER ONE (1) AT ALL COSTS" (links to all posts are on the COMMENTS Page).

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

I received my Pratt Alumni Card today (inbound into IA) mail, as the School indicated they had sent it this past week (the week beginning 4/7/2013), and it was received in 5 days total (including the day it was mailed). However, my (outbound from IA) mail sent from the Anamosa, IA Post Office to TCI College of Technology, in New York City as well for my replacement Diploma mailed one week prior to Alumni card on April 4, 2013 has not yet been received by the Asst. Registrar for processing at my last check earlier today 4/15/2013. (I have no way of telling whether it was received at the School and not yet reached her desk or if it was not yet received at the School overall). I hope this isn’t a sign of more of the same (see the post AN UNMISTAKABLE AN ON-GOING PATTERN THAT HAS RESULTED IN MY DECISION TO RELOCATE - UPDATED), with this mailing shown below, because there would be NO Pratt without TCI (see MY TCI ATTENDANCE FILE - inc. 34 photos, rpresented by pohoto below). All links indicated as well as photos are on the COMMENTS Page

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

One of the main issues affecting our society today is too little attention being paid to what's important, which is not typically found in the "spectacular", which our world sadly has come to revere. In other words the more grandiose the better etc.; (so we have been led to believe), therefore, it's no wonder that some felt that their "spectacular coincidental disasters" would be sufficient to erase my journey in this Country. Those insignificant details of yesteryear in my case is what "foiled a blackout" (as documented in the post THE CHANGES THAT FOILED THE BLACKOUT (UPDATED) - link on COMMENTS Page. Likewise the meaning of a term from a Special day plus four of a few years ago holds many critical factors that remained remarkably uncharted then though skilled in that undertaking in spite of their deeper meaning then and what is being sought today! Paying attention to detail and then seeking to understand what is being conveyed is an art form lost on our instant society because it involves two steps, (like the process God uses to enrich our lives also involves two steps - as documented in the post GOD DOES INDEED HONOR THE PRAYERS OF A CARING MOTHER! (link on COMMENTS Page), which could help many refocus their lives and realize that they first need to take action to get wisdom and then follow-up by carrying out the next step involved in obtaining understanding if the time was taken to find out what such hold, but in our fast paced world, of 30-second commercials that sell everything and then some, alas there is no time for seemingly intricate facets that hold answers most lack in our (I must have it today, this instant) world even if what's being sought belongs to others who expended the time and effort to achieve such, while Johnnie-come-lately "shadowy free loader" (link on COMMENTS Page) types lurk behind every corner, alleyway and residence in Hempstead of yesteryear in search of what belongs to others who sacrificed while they wait in dark shadowy alleyways to pounce on the object of their desires at every opportunity available. These words for today are focused on the meaning of the term referenced above that will shed light in the current darkness!

J_F_Brazant said...

Since those "free loader's cause" types have a tendency to use their same methods; repeatedly, one of, which is mail diversion as documented in the post AN UNMISTAKABLE AN ON-GOING PATTERN THAT HAS RESULTED IN MY DECISION TO RELOCATE - UPDATED as a means of demonstrating fleeting "legitimacy", when my summer Pratt Alumni Folio magazine is received, (which is due around this time), as well as my TCI replacement diploma, Since my letter of request dated April 4, 2013 depicted in comment # 1 from 4/15/2013 was mailed on the same date and it was pointed out by the School Registrar's Office that the request was received and to allow sufficient time for them to check their off site warehouse for very old records, which has now been done (in the approximate 60 days allowed and as a result ); it is also expected around this time, therefore, both will be documented here on receipt. Note: all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.

J_F_Brazant said...

The STOP PAYMENT ORDER will only be rescinded when the proceeds are in my possession TO PREVENT absconders of ANY TYPE from initiating any form OF DIVERSIONS. Note any and all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

This comment was originally posted on September 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM

Since the INSTRUCTIONS as documented in this post (that included a specific path of communication to receive further directions), were altered by the events described in the FOOTNOTE as well as in item # 16 of the listing depicted in the post "FREELOADERS" AND THEIR "CREDIBILITY" - THE UNTOLD STORY (UPDATED), that were beyond my control, when the funds are received, it will be documented HERE! Note: all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

Originally posted at 10/23/2013 @ 3:09 PM
Since those of the "free loader's cause" are fond of "checkbook legitimacy" (regardless of the method used for making such disbursements), as a means of demonstrating fleeting "legitimacy" in the identities of others when all else fails, it must be noted for the record that I have not made any contribution to my alma mater, Pratt since 2011 and this same inaction, in that regard will continue again this year (since my priorities are mainly focused on relocation and other "new" business format (announced on February 1, 2013, see CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Page) as well as relationship issues of a more personal nature and all the associated details involved) and NONE are authorized to make any contribution on my behalf in any amount or format. while my attention is directed on these matters. Note" all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.

J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J_F_Brazant said...

Originally posted 11/26/2013 @ 9:31 PM

This is the time around, which the Fall/Winter edition of the Pratt Folio Alumni magazine is typically due. However, it does not matter whether or not I receive it at this time as I have previously because I am focused on relocating from here at the address, (which has been my residence since 1992), once all my affairs (as documented in THE REFERENCED POST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COMMENT, BELOW, AFTER "on THE TIME...", are completed here and my attention (to digress) is directed on starting over elsewhere but this time, taking the time to ensure that I do not make a similar mistake again by considering and not ignoring any potential warning "flag(s)", (which in all honesty existed but I chose to ignore the first time around to avoid a similar ending, that is not the best for either me or another party, regardless of how difficult the decision may be because it still will be less complicated up front). The more complicated matters are initially, the more the likelihood that issues will arise to derail any potential relationship that may result and that isn't fair to the individual or to me personally and I would not want to proceed headlong into any situation in such an environment. This is the conclusion I have arrived at after giving this scenario/approach much consideration as the hurdle for me to overcome is simply too high, in this regard taking all the competing issues into consideration, especially after having now given the approach discussed elsewhere on the pages of this Blog more in depth consideration and I cannot make that initial trip I intended on relocating from here as originally intended and I wish my dear "acquaintance" all the best in her future plans. No matter how hazy conditions may appear to be on occasion, the potential for a different scenario always will exists if we take the time to carefully examine all matters as they exists before us rather than make any radical decisions of a complete rearrangement type approach and leave the rest to time, which has a way of working out such matters, if we allow for such to take place when appropriate as oppose to inappropriate opportunity arises.

(To resume): If it should show up afterwards, that's okay but I am not going to any extraordinary lengths in an effort to secure the magazine that should be delivered to me as it typically is in spite of my relocation plans. However, if it does not show up this would be an indication that those of the "free loaders cause" have been up to their usual practices as they typically are in search of fleeting "legitimacy" via the methods/individual(s) documented either in the introduction of the post "FREE LOADERS" AND THEIR "CREDIBILITY", THE UNTOLD STORY - UPDATED (using one with a questionable reputation) as well as AN UNMISTAKABLE AND ONGOING PATTERN THAT HAS RESULTED IN MY DECISION TO RELOCATE - UPDATED. Note: all links are available on the COMMENTS Page.

J_F_Brazant said...

For details about my copy of the Fall/Winter edition of the Pratt Alumni Folio magazine, see the Comment # 1 on the post Supplement to "Free Loaders" and their Examples (or Comment # 1 from the COMMENTS 2013 Page). Note: all links are also available on the COMMENTS 2013 Page.

J_F_Brazant said...

THIS COMMENT WAS ORIGINALLY POSTEDD ON OCTOBER 12 @ 11:25 AM USING MY GOOGLE+ PROFILE AND WAS DELETED MY ME USING MY HOBBY BLOGGER PROFILE. IT WAS THEN REPOSTED AT 11:53 AM ON THE SAME DATE WITH THAT SAME BLOGGER PROFILE. IT IS NOW BEEN REMOVED BY ME AND REPOSTED TODAY 3/23/2014 @ 5:03 PM.

(FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, SEE COMMENT # 1 FROM THAT DATE ON THIS PAGE, BELOW); (NAMELY DEPICTING THEIR RECEIPT HERE IN THE COMMENTS SECTION OF THE INDICATED POST) IS NOW THE ONLY MEANS FOR DOCUMENTING/VALIDATING POSSESSION OF THE OVERDUE RESOURCES, ONCE RECEIVED. on THE TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW MR. BUFFETT (EDITED AND UPDATED W/INSTRUCTIONS) [Please note: whether J_F_Brazant or James F. Brazant is used, I'm still the same individual and no indication of another individual with the same name residing st this simple address as some have attempted to mislead others into accepting as "thruth"].

J_F_Brazant said...

With the receipt of this final installment of my cash balance pension plan payment amount funds (see below photo), that were owed me due to inaccurate payments (due to improper calculation of the interest rate)by the plan Payee (also for a lengthy time); I should receive the other funds owed me, even those owed for other lengthy period, which is the subject of this post. Note: all links, photos and laest updates of the post are available on the COMMENTS 2014 Page.

J_F_Brazant said...

This post as well as others have been replaced by THE TIME FOR THE "OVERLOOKED" PAYMENT IS HERE MR. BUFFETT and is no longer being updated to document the receipt of payment, which will be documented in that post instead. Note: all links, photos and latest updates are documented on the COMMENTS Page as appropriate.