Introduction:
“The unmasking of Zionism - Facing Reality” was the subject of an article from Writer DC in one of the leading newspapers in my Country of birth and citizenship from May 20, 2002. This Writer as many others has mistakenly taken up the specific view about who and what His people are all about, based on the examples of those who are now inhabiting the traditional/historical land identified in scripture and have assigned to themselves the title Israelites. This post after all is an attempt to unmask the misconceptions about who God’s chosen people really are (and the misconception among many about what they are supposed to look like and as a result, assign to those impostors who appear to be similar to others of a specific "design", the heredity of another based solely on external criterion, determined by those adopting the type of "guidelines" described in the bulleted listing under "...the IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE role of determining outcomes for others...", wording in the CONERVERY "HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION) and by so doing, attempting to play "god" in the lives of others with a twist, because the actions of the Creator are not based on the exploitation of His creation for financial gain.
Here are The Background Details:
This Writer introduced his topic by pointing out that now more than ever the world needs an international movement for peace, justice and human development to, which he offered Palestine as one of the central issues around such a movement must be built and he pointed out that cause of the Palestinians have been the hapless victims of two of the most oppressive and violent forces of modern times, Zionism and European imperialism. He went on to state that this movement was founded by a European Jew called Theodore Harzi who has been cast as the “father” of Zionism and who also established the World Zionist Congress In 1897. In his view, the Zionist Congress and other related organizations, set about to “steal” Palestine from its Arab occupiers and decimate and disperse them and instead replace them with Jewish colonial settlers. In his account of the history of the Palestinians, the Writer indicated that over the past 100 years, the land was occupied by 600,000 Muslim and Christian Arabs who had lived there for centuries in relative peace with a few thousand adherents of religion of Judaism. However, to the detriment of these peaceful inhabitants, hundreds of miles away in Europe, members of the Jewish middle and elite classes were in the process of establishing a Jewish national movement dedicated to the construction of a nationally powerful, exclusive Jewish nation state. Labeled Zionism, initially the Zionists did not care where they ended up forming their new state as a number of locations were considered, including: Uganda in Africa, Guyana in South America and Canada, but once Palestine was agreed on, their cause was emboldened.
The
Implications/Possibilities That Exists:
Over the same 100
year-period previously mentioned, the Writer points out that every possible
technique was used against the Palestinian Arabs, ranging from utilization of
the international Jewish capital to the purchase of land and disposing occupants,
the imposition of economic and politically discriminatory measures, the use of
organized murder, rape and physical destruction to terrorize and intimidate;
and outright warfare and physical annexation of so-called “conquered land,”
assisted at every stage of this process by leading European and North American
nations. In his opinion, the British saw the settlers as suitable and strategic
European partners to make inroads into the oil rich middle east. It was pointed
out by the Writer that these early Zionists of the 1920s and 1930s were so
eager to work with any power that would assist them in their ends that they
regularly collaborated with the fascist regimes of Hitler and Mussolini at
times when they appeared to be on the verge of victory. The Writer ended his
article with a call for solidarity and support for the Palestinian cause
because it appears to be hopeless, when its considered that they were living in
relative peace in numbers of approximately 600,000 with only a few thousand
adherents to religion of Judaism to being outnumbered numerically as well as
militarily and totally dependent on the nation that controls the waterway for
even the collection of their revenues to operate their needed infrastructure
required to maintain a properly functioning society.
The Finale:
As pointed out in the previous post “WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO BE FAIR,” no one really knows who and where God’s chosen people are, except Him and with the subtle evolutionary changes that all have experienced depending on where our ancestors settled as indicated in the below artistic depiction.
It was ONE that called His chosen Israel from the beginning, when He “struggled” with Jacob and then PASSED OVER the firstborn to specifically identify who would be His as documented in the post THE PREMISE BEHIND THE "FLAWED" LEGISLATION - UPDATED. Therefore
just because a group of “hawkish” Jewish settlers decided to apply the name
Israel to the place they ended up deciding upon for a homeland, (bearing in
mind that this was not the only location under consideration), has no real
significance to who and where the chosen really are as it certainly does not
imply that such individuals as a group have collectively cornered God’s chosen
in one specific location. This is a common misconception that many have
struggled with including this Writer and even another “Friend” of this
Blogger’s cause whose situation is linked on the pages of this Blog (who
himself was targeted because of his position in government at the specific
point in time when his Country was visited), because the actions of this State
with its carefully selected name are confused with Biblical description of
God’s chosen people, as being one and the same.
Those who call themselves by the term modern day Jews, a term by the way, which is not an original term for the people of God as it is ONLY first introduced in scripture in the Biblical book of 2nd Kings 16:6 as applied to His people scattered in Syria. The second introduction of this word in scripture is found in the Biblical book of Esther 3:13 as applied to His people scattered throughout the kingdom of the Medes and the Persians. The third use of this word in the Bible is found in the book of Daniel 3:8 where His people are scattered throughout the Babylonian empire. However, in those books considered the New Testament, it occurs in Acts 16:3 and 18:2. It must be noted that for all the names Isaiah the prophet could apply to these select individuals in the book, of Isaiah 11:11-12, (who were scattered throughout various nations he chose: 1) “remnant of His people”, 2) “outcasts of Israel” and 3) “dispersed of Judah”, while pointing out that they would be gathered from: Assyria, Cush, Elan, Egypt, Hamath, Pathryos, “the four corners of the earth” and “the islands of the sea”. This passage also indicates that this would be the second occasion on, which such an occurrence would take place.
Conclusion:
As a result, it
can be concluded that this non-original name for people assumed to be God's was only
attributed to those scattered in Syria, the kingdom of the Medes and the Persians and
the Babylonian empire and was most likely brought about by the females mixing
with those of the nations to, which they were scattered automatically excluding
them from being potentially among God’s chosen as only the offspring of males from Israel was counted in determining heredity
according to His law, making these types (with a male not from Israel as the father) a part of the “family tree” of the
families of the local countries where they were taken by their captors. Furthermore, the reason
why this word would gradually replace God’s selected name for his chosen would
be due to inter marrying and or “mixing” of the females from Israel with local
males, disqualifying such offspring produced from being considered among His
people according to His law since His ways don’t change, because they were so many more of such offspring as opposed to offspring from those including a male from Israel in captivity. Supporting such a
scenario is the fact that when such conquests typically occurred, the males
were targeted for destruction, replacement or even worse. Therefore, the
likelihood of males from Israel in captivity first of all surviving, and secondly being able to
produce offspring would be far less likely to occur and vastly outnumbered as any such males who
survived would more realistically be the very, very young in all fairness, in any were so fortunate to have survived, ensuring that generations in
many instances would be lost and then being able to produce offspring according to the avenue defined by God
strictly for determining heredity would be rare and remote indeed, as previously emphasized. Therefore, if those now occupying the traditional Biblical territory can't be automatically considered to be Israel according to the methods outlined by God, it is all the more unlikely that a band of "free loaders" who know absolutely nothing about God could be even remotely considered to be of His chosen and descendants of His original 3rd tribe, confirming the Biblical view in His two (2) Witnesses that Christ was the 1st since Abraham who understood what God truly meant by the symbolic circumcision ritual around, which his covenant was based, namely a "Circumcised Heart" as described in the post AMENDMENT TO THE EVENTS IN THE LIVES OF GOD'S CHOSEN ARE ORDERED - UPDATED. Furthermore, as consistently pointed out in the Pages of this Blog, namely that IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR THOSE WHO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT GOD, ALONG WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF OTHERS WHO KNOW EVEN LESS ABOUT HIM AND WHOSE ONLY OBJECTIVE IS TO "DEMONSTRATE" A CONNECTION TO BEING DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, NO MATTER HOW ITS OBTAINED (AS THE LIST OF EVENTS OF EVENTS IN THE FOOTNOTE OF THE POST IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN - UPDATED?, DEMONSTRATES), FOR MONETARY PURPOSES; TO EVEN DEMONSTRATE RESPECT FOR HIM AND BE CONSIDERED OF HIS ORIGINAL 3RD TRIBE). THIS IS CONFIRMED BY THE DETAILS GENERALLY DESCRIBED IN THE POST EXPEDIENTLY TAKING ON IDENTITIES MAY BRING MORE THAN BARGAIN FOR - UPDATED AND AMENDED!, AND IMPLIES A BASIC UNAWARENESS OF ALL THINGS SPIRITUAL AND IT'S JUST NOT POSSIBLE FOR SUCH TO BE HIS (CHOSEN) AS HE MAKES NO MISTAKES (as documented in the updated Comment contained in the post HOW CAN A BUSINESS BE OPERATED LIKE A DICTATORSHIP IN A FREE SOCIETY, EDITED AND UPDATED)?).
The final outcome of this scenario is that care must be exercised when the actions of those who go by the title of Jews and are occupying a specific location being automatically equated with being inclusive of God’s chosen, this is a mistake of significant proportions since HE DOES NOT CHANGE BUT DOES MAKE HIS BLESSINGS CONDITIONAL WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THEY CAN BE WITHDRAWN IF OUR PART IS NOT UPHELD BUT TO HIS CREDIT, HE MAKES ALL AWARE OF SUCH AND DOES NOT HIDE HIS INTENTIONS FROM HIS! It is for this reason, why He was(is) so particular about who His chosen from the tribe of Levi who served in various functions (in place of the firstborn for His work) could be married to (even from among Israel), as documented in the post, GOD DOES INDEED HONOR THE PRAYERS OF A CARING MOTHER - (EDITED AND UPDATED).
“The unmasking of Zionism - Facing Reality” was the subject of an article from Writer DC in one of the leading newspapers in my Country of birth and citizenship from May 20, 2002. This Writer as many others has mistakenly taken up the specific view about who and what His people are all about, based on the examples of those who are now inhabiting the traditional/historical land identified in scripture and have assigned to themselves the title Israelites. This post after all is an attempt to unmask the misconceptions about who God’s chosen people really are (and the misconception among many about what they are supposed to look like and as a result, assign to those impostors who appear to be similar to others of a specific "design", the heredity of another based solely on external criterion, determined by those adopting the type of "guidelines" described in the bulleted listing under "...the IMMENSE and UNENVIABLE role of determining outcomes for others...", wording in the CONERVERY "HOLDING BASE" DEDICATION) and by so doing, attempting to play "god" in the lives of others with a twist, because the actions of the Creator are not based on the exploitation of His creation for financial gain.
Here are The Background Details:
This Writer introduced his topic by pointing out that now more than ever the world needs an international movement for peace, justice and human development to, which he offered Palestine as one of the central issues around such a movement must be built and he pointed out that cause of the Palestinians have been the hapless victims of two of the most oppressive and violent forces of modern times, Zionism and European imperialism. He went on to state that this movement was founded by a European Jew called Theodore Harzi who has been cast as the “father” of Zionism and who also established the World Zionist Congress In 1897. In his view, the Zionist Congress and other related organizations, set about to “steal” Palestine from its Arab occupiers and decimate and disperse them and instead replace them with Jewish colonial settlers. In his account of the history of the Palestinians, the Writer indicated that over the past 100 years, the land was occupied by 600,000 Muslim and Christian Arabs who had lived there for centuries in relative peace with a few thousand adherents of religion of Judaism. However, to the detriment of these peaceful inhabitants, hundreds of miles away in Europe, members of the Jewish middle and elite classes were in the process of establishing a Jewish national movement dedicated to the construction of a nationally powerful, exclusive Jewish nation state. Labeled Zionism, initially the Zionists did not care where they ended up forming their new state as a number of locations were considered, including: Uganda in Africa, Guyana in South America and Canada, but once Palestine was agreed on, their cause was emboldened.
The
Implications/Possibilities That Exists:
Over the same 100
year-period previously mentioned, the Writer points out that every possible
technique was used against the Palestinian Arabs, ranging from utilization of
the international Jewish capital to the purchase of land and disposing occupants,
the imposition of economic and politically discriminatory measures, the use of
organized murder, rape and physical destruction to terrorize and intimidate;
and outright warfare and physical annexation of so-called “conquered land,”
assisted at every stage of this process by leading European and North American
nations. In his opinion, the British saw the settlers as suitable and strategic
European partners to make inroads into the oil rich middle east. It was pointed
out by the Writer that these early Zionists of the 1920s and 1930s were so
eager to work with any power that would assist them in their ends that they
regularly collaborated with the fascist regimes of Hitler and Mussolini at
times when they appeared to be on the verge of victory. The Writer ended his
article with a call for solidarity and support for the Palestinian cause
because it appears to be hopeless, when its considered that they were living in
relative peace in numbers of approximately 600,000 with only a few thousand
adherents to religion of Judaism to being outnumbered numerically as well as
militarily and totally dependent on the nation that controls the waterway for
even the collection of their revenues to operate their needed infrastructure
required to maintain a properly functioning society.The Finale:
As pointed out in the previous post “WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO BE FAIR,” no one really knows who and where God’s chosen people are, except Him and with the subtle evolutionary changes that all have experienced depending on where our ancestors settled as indicated in the below artistic depiction.
 |
The picturesque Tiger swallowtail butterfly shown “on a mission” to the prized “pollen” is taking the alternate path to get to its objective by slowly making the way up the lily to the flower in its sights. In addition, this species is unique in that all the males only have these brightly colored appearances, while only some of the females are so colorfully adorned. They (the females) tend to be darker, mostly black with spots of blue, orange and yellow along the edges of the wings due to the subtle evolution of this variety to adapt to their environment surroundings as a form of protection similar to the manner in, which most of God’s creation have from man down to even butterflies. The dark form of the tiger, for example is similar to the pipevine swallowtail, which creates a chemical in its body that's distasteful to birds. In addition, eggs of the tiger and several other swallowtails look like birds droppings. Furthermore, after awhile, the eggs turn green to blend with the leaves that the larvae will feed on. These larvae then curl the leaves over themselves with silk, and develop large fake eyespots that make them look like small snakes.
Those of the free loaders cause" with their borrowed lineages pretend to be anything that can give them the desired "credibility" they "A-L-L" lack due to origin issues. This is as true for those latest of comers, the more "refined" types of the "free loaders" discussed in detail on the pages of this Blog as it is for other types who came during the farm crisis of the late 70's and early 80's from eastern European countries. THEY ALL HAVE "ORIGIN ISSUES". |
Those who call themselves by the term modern day Jews, a term by the way, which is not an original term for the people of God as it is ONLY first introduced in scripture in the Biblical book of 2nd Kings 16:6 as applied to His people scattered in Syria. The second introduction of this word in scripture is found in the Biblical book of Esther 3:13 as applied to His people scattered throughout the kingdom of the Medes and the Persians. The third use of this word in the Bible is found in the book of Daniel 3:8 where His people are scattered throughout the Babylonian empire. However, in those books considered the New Testament, it occurs in Acts 16:3 and 18:2. It must be noted that for all the names Isaiah the prophet could apply to these select individuals in the book, of Isaiah 11:11-12, (who were scattered throughout various nations he chose: 1) “remnant of His people”, 2) “outcasts of Israel” and 3) “dispersed of Judah”, while pointing out that they would be gathered from: Assyria, Cush, Elan, Egypt, Hamath, Pathryos, “the four corners of the earth” and “the islands of the sea”. This passage also indicates that this would be the second occasion on, which such an occurrence would take place.
Conclusion:
As a result, it
can be concluded that this non-original name for people assumed to be God's was only
attributed to those scattered in Syria, the kingdom of the Medes and the Persians and
the Babylonian empire and was most likely brought about by the females mixing
with those of the nations to, which they were scattered automatically excluding
them from being potentially among God’s chosen as only the offspring of males from Israel was counted in determining heredity
according to His law, making these types (with a male not from Israel as the father) a part of the “family tree” of the
families of the local countries where they were taken by their captors. Furthermore, the reason
why this word would gradually replace God’s selected name for his chosen would
be due to inter marrying and or “mixing” of the females from Israel with local
males, disqualifying such offspring produced from being considered among His
people according to His law since His ways don’t change, because they were so many more of such offspring as opposed to offspring from those including a male from Israel in captivity. Supporting such a
scenario is the fact that when such conquests typically occurred, the males
were targeted for destruction, replacement or even worse. Therefore, the
likelihood of males from Israel in captivity first of all surviving, and secondly being able to
produce offspring would be far less likely to occur and vastly outnumbered as any such males who
survived would more realistically be the very, very young in all fairness, in any were so fortunate to have survived, ensuring that generations in
many instances would be lost and then being able to produce offspring according to the avenue defined by God
strictly for determining heredity would be rare and remote indeed, as previously emphasized. Therefore, if those now occupying the traditional Biblical territory can't be automatically considered to be Israel according to the methods outlined by God, it is all the more unlikely that a band of "free loaders" who know absolutely nothing about God could be even remotely considered to be of His chosen and descendants of His original 3rd tribe, confirming the Biblical view in His two (2) Witnesses that Christ was the 1st since Abraham who understood what God truly meant by the symbolic circumcision ritual around, which his covenant was based, namely a "Circumcised Heart" as described in the post AMENDMENT TO THE EVENTS IN THE LIVES OF GOD'S CHOSEN ARE ORDERED - UPDATED. Furthermore, as consistently pointed out in the Pages of this Blog, namely that IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR THOSE WHO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT GOD, ALONG WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF OTHERS WHO KNOW EVEN LESS ABOUT HIM AND WHOSE ONLY OBJECTIVE IS TO "DEMONSTRATE" A CONNECTION TO BEING DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, NO MATTER HOW ITS OBTAINED (AS THE LIST OF EVENTS OF EVENTS IN THE FOOTNOTE OF THE POST IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN - UPDATED?, DEMONSTRATES), FOR MONETARY PURPOSES; TO EVEN DEMONSTRATE RESPECT FOR HIM AND BE CONSIDERED OF HIS ORIGINAL 3RD TRIBE). THIS IS CONFIRMED BY THE DETAILS GENERALLY DESCRIBED IN THE POST EXPEDIENTLY TAKING ON IDENTITIES MAY BRING MORE THAN BARGAIN FOR - UPDATED AND AMENDED!, AND IMPLIES A BASIC UNAWARENESS OF ALL THINGS SPIRITUAL AND IT'S JUST NOT POSSIBLE FOR SUCH TO BE HIS (CHOSEN) AS HE MAKES NO MISTAKES (as documented in the updated Comment contained in the post HOW CAN A BUSINESS BE OPERATED LIKE A DICTATORSHIP IN A FREE SOCIETY, EDITED AND UPDATED)?).The final outcome of this scenario is that care must be exercised when the actions of those who go by the title of Jews and are occupying a specific location being automatically equated with being inclusive of God’s chosen, this is a mistake of significant proportions since HE DOES NOT CHANGE BUT DOES MAKE HIS BLESSINGS CONDITIONAL WITH THE CAVEAT THAT THEY CAN BE WITHDRAWN IF OUR PART IS NOT UPHELD BUT TO HIS CREDIT, HE MAKES ALL AWARE OF SUCH AND DOES NOT HIDE HIS INTENTIONS FROM HIS! It is for this reason, why He was(is) so particular about who His chosen from the tribe of Levi who served in various functions (in place of the firstborn for His work) could be married to (even from among Israel), as documented in the post, GOD DOES INDEED HONOR THE PRAYERS OF A CARING MOTHER - (EDITED AND UPDATED).
