THE CONDITIONAL PRICE OF VOLUNTEERING - (UPDATED 5/13, 5/19, 5/25, 5/31, 6/24, 7/19 & 12/2/2013 as well as 1/17, 1/22, 1/23, 2/15 & 8/7/2014)!

THE OFFER TO PROVIDE VOLUNTARY ASSISTANCE TO ONE SHOULD SHE SEEK HIGHER ELECTIVE OFFICE, IS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, SEE THE POST THE QUESTION OF THE MONTH'S PREMISE - UPDATED FOR THE AVAILABILITY OF A SIMILAR, BUT GENERIC OFFER FOR THE CAUSE OF LOIS BRUNO OF THE "CHISHOLM FAMILY INCLUSIVE" WHO WAS SUBJECTED TO THE SAME TYPE OF TREATMENT AS ONE LABELED A "TERRORIST" AS DOCUMENTED IN THE CONCLUSION SECTION OF THE POST  WHAT DOES TREATING OTHERS AS PROPERTY AND THE LOTTERY HAVE IN COMMON - UPDATED AND AMENDED?



This is really a restating of various comments from the COMMENTS Page, uniquely combined for the emphasis they hold and compiled in follow-up to the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING (EDITED & UPDATED), to serve as a reminder that my offer to "volunteer" was always intended to be conditional, because I have never chosen to follow expedient decision-making causes and would never participate in any such activities. The applicable criteria are documented in various posts, shown below as follows:

Here are the Points of Interest:

1. comment # 1 from 4/21/2013 - "The approach by individuals towards any situation is largely based on their experiences; how any situation is handled will be governed by those unique experiences that have shaped their lives, which includes me as well as it is true for all individuals. Therefore, when confronted with any scenario, the manner in, which it is handled will be as a direct result of each individual's unique "makeup". An individual who is accustomed to handling matters by a certain instinctive pattern, (for ex. thuggish behavior will NOT suddenly make a 180 degree turn and handle an issue in a Mother Theresa approach). The difference between my approach now versus then has been documented in all fairness in the second paragraph of the post THE OUTSPOKEN PEN PAL WHO BECAME A FRIEND (EDITED W/INSERTS - UPDATED/AMENDED); and if its implications are "carefully understood" will greatly assist in the realization of many things alluded to along the way, between then and now in for example the final paragraph of The Finale/Outcome section of the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING (EDITED & UPDATED). In addition, this subject matter is of such importance that further clarification and discussion is provided on this issue in the post THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GOD'S LAW AND MAN'S;
2. comment # 2 from 4/24/2013 - "I do believe in the eventual triumph of "good over evil" and look forward to progress being made on the specific ventures being undertaken to address the new services offering and all various tasks documented in the post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING (EDITED & UPDATED) and in those associated applicable individuals so deserving in the various affairs of the Proprietorship in need of addressing going forward in these challenging times!!!";
3. as well as comment # 1 from 4/23/2013, which includes - "It is because of my (limited) "understanding" and consideration of the issues involved that the offer regarding the Category of Compliance et al's cause exists as documented in comment # 2 from 4/20/2013 on COMMENTS Page; because in this regard, in my opinion assistance to a most deserving situation can be provided were greater appreciation in the long run will be a most fitting outcome for those involved once the cause of others from my perspective are given their due and those of myself (or me) personally are set aside. If viewed from this point-of-view hopefully it will be seen in a different light!". THIS OPTION IS MODIFIED BY # 9 BELOW.                                                        
4. comment # 1 from 4/29/2013 - "This is not a difficult, situation, as the pathway forward has already been provided in the form of directions intentionally included in various comments, and required to be considered together, such as first; comment # 1 from 4/17/2013 on the COMMENTS Page and restated here for convenience, which state: "Carefully follow the directions/instructions in the post  TIME FOR PAYMENT IS NOW, MR. BUFFETT (EDITED AND UPDATED W/INSTRUCTIONS/AMENDED); and then wait for my follow-up responses/acknowledgements indicated (to avoid duplicity) as well and the pathway to "FREEDOM FOR ALL" will be readily made available!" - This scenario will eliminate the same "hobbled" concern at issue. Secondly, before carrying out the above instructions be very mindful that responses to specific questions as indicated in comment # 2 from 4/17/2013 and reinforced in comment # 1 from 4/26/2013 all on COMMENTS Page are essential for the intended purpose described. Next, the offer as provided and documented in comment # 2 from 4/20/2013 on the COMMENTS Page REMAINS as long as is needed for proper decision-making.
5. Finally the criteria regarding instituting measures to eliminate the tendency to resort to Expedient Decision-Making in comment # 2 from 4/17/2013 on the COMMENTS  Page are also an integral part of the effort!".
6. comment # 1 on this post THE COST OF VOLUNTEERING (EDITED & UPDATED) as well as from 4/20/2013 on the COMMENTS Page - "My decision to withdraw the Proprietorship from political and other services offering was not an easy one and was given much consideration as documented in the Services Announcement of February 1, 2013 and the Services Decision Update of April 7, 2013, which further described the thoughtfulness in my decision-making regarding the non-political services as documented on the CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Page. The discovery in the end of the events surrounding the “Chisholm Family Inclusive” further helped me to realize that my efforts could NOT in my opinion make any impact (or CHANGE) in the type of environment where those developments depicted in the post “IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN (UPDATED)?”,  took place and it was treated as if nothing abhorrent and distasteful had occurred and underscored by the election year debate stop in Hempstead enacted by those who in the opinion of this Blogger, thought that this was a fitting way to “move on” (or cover-up) what obviously took place. Out of respect for and against the backdrop those lives and accomplishments of those treated with such disrespect, was the decision made to focus mainly on one specific area of the services offering. Furthermore, it is hoped that any individual who may have been impacted by these changes would be as understanding of the seriousness involved in this matter in, which those unconscionable types dictated how once very meaningful lives were cut off so callously for a very morally despicable cause in an atmosphere where it would appear that the less concern shown to others the more “successful” one can become and this is a path in, which I will always find very difficult to travel on in all fairness and I hope it (my decision) will be seen in this light by those with true concern for the cause of others. The basic point that must be faced here is the fact that the Hempstead debate election year cycle stop is a classic example of expedient as oppose to sound decision-making [see the post EXPEDIENT DECISION-MAKING, ALWAYS A MISTAKE (EDITED)] and the reality must be faced that it’s impossible to bring CHANGE to a structure, which at its core is based on expedient decision-making. What eventually will take place is that this structure will ultimately change anyone attempting to follow a different direction because all of its assets are inherently comprised and/or have become cemented around following such an outline for addressing issues!".
7. As a POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE to # 3 above NOW REPLACED BY # 9 BELOW, the specific condition in comment # 2 from 5/13/2013 is offered if the potential for overlap and any other unintentional issues are created with the following - "As previously stated this is a matter of style versus substance, however, this lone alteration to my previous conditions will be made to address the main concern repeatedly raised in this regard, as follows: - To avoid the central concern as it appears to me, the offer will be limited to the subsidiaries ONLY, and in this way, the potential for the type of balance regarding proprietary issues will be removed. Therefore, instead of erecting "roadblocks" as previously stated, since the "VITAL" issues will be addressed more importantly, the prior "roadblock" will be eliminated. As a result, give those involved in the subsidiary only, a voice in the decision-making and let it rest there as previously indicated on various occasions. Having accepted the outcome of this approach, let us work together to adopt these recommendations regarding the subsidiaries and lend our collective strengths to the singular activity but collectively to the dual challenges involved in assisting in a very worthy cause, instead of attempting to tear down at every instance, and with this singular but collective focus on just this part, the potential for overlapping of the proprietary details will be removed for both efforts. Satisfaction will be obtained from witnessing the successes of the singular cause of the subsidiaries with new hope for a future previously without. This is a cause I am very much aware that care/concern exists on the part of an interested party and an offer from one who is continually working to determine the best possible solution under the circumstances from then to now with the conditions that presently exists as described in the post, THE MAKING OF A "GENUINE" HERO, (EDITED AND UPDATED)!, and have concluded that this will help address the greatest issues to the previous broadly focused solution offer, raised."
8. Highlights the steps to pursue that would clearly demonstrate LEADERSHIP OF THE ADAPTABLE REGAN MOLD, (depicted below as needed for times comparable to what was faced by Franklin where a renewal was needed that Regan was able to galvanize the Nation around as a change in direction was needed, which he recognize and encouraged the nation to move in a different direction with new hope based on his boyhood's hero actions and this is where the adaptability is needed as the times are more generally consistent with those of the earlier renewal. However, the adaptable Regan mold can be skillfully utilized to address the needs required for these times as well. This eventuality is awaiting that "remarkable" individual uniquely prepared to follow in the adaptable Regan mold specifically suited for today's times to address the various issues involved in the approach for addressing a scenario in, which a main and one subsidiary is each in need of a different type of turn around (simultaneously, without impacting the specific needs involved included in the selected categorizing arrangement in step # 9 from the above referenced post), being followed for the "BIG PICTURE VIEW" (clarified in comment # 2 from 6/3/2013 on the COMMENTS Page and below); indicated as needed for achieving similar successes as required, in a reversal of methodology ultimately, (which includes a dynamic to a static method of approach with the chosen location being the static objective instead, for the obvious reasons, namely that a renewal is required similar to what was previously carried out and for such, one must go back to the original situation in principle as in an instance when a bad choice has been made and a repeated return to the starting point is brought about for starting over as outlined in the post WHAT IS YOUR FORK-IN-THE-ROAD SITUATION TODAY?).
9. Comments #s 2 and 1 from 5/25/2013 respectively on the COMMENTS Page are included to address the final approach being pursued INSTEAD OF EITHER  # 3 OR # 6 ABOVE, as follows: 2) "In a situation where a turn around is needed and three almost totally independent functioning entities are involved, where the main business structure is in need of a turn around as well as one of the subsidiaries with the other subsidiaries being a healthy functioning entity, these have to be treated as three separate parts of one larger body. The healthy functioning part should be isolated from the other non-healthy subsidiary as far as practical and dealt with differently to avoid conflict developing between those associated with the non-healthy and the healthy functioning entities with respect to the turn around activities and even more so with those associated with the main structure and the healthy functioning subsidiary. The approach to at minimum separate the subsidiaries from the main structure is a start from, which progress can be worked out and eventually bring about more interaction very gradually when significant turn around progress has been implemented for the obvious reasons. This caveat, in conjunction with the previous approach documented in comment # 2 from 4/23/2013 on THIS Page (modified) should produce the desired outcome as long as the essential will exists for change in those associated with the main and its non-healthy functioning subsidiary and as a result, the structural approach previously outlined (ex. no involvement for some limited for others etc., modified as appropriate to address the different landscape as indicated above, should be workable). In addition, the approach outlined in comment # 1 for 5/25/2013 on the THIS Page in conjunction with this modification should form the basis for a desirable solution to effect the needed turn "arounds" and reach successful outcomes as appropriate and eventually pave the way forward to new beginnings for all."; 1) "The plan of action outlined can and will be implemented, with the "big picture" view previously defined for those deserving subsidiaries, in all fairness, in order that the vacant place awaiting the right individual as depicted in the post THE TWO GREATEST DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GOD'S LAW AND MAN'S can be occupied to implement the intended course of action as specifically outlined in the post THE CONDITIONAL PRICE OF VOLUNTEERING (UPDATED) as well as summarized in comment # 2 from 5/23/2013 and elsewhere on THIS Page with the applicable indicated ordered arrangements/steps carefully outlined to be followed in order to achieve success for times such as these, referenced in the post ADDENDUM TO THE CONDITIONAL PRICE OF VOLUNTEERING and in comment # 2 from 5/11/2013 on THIS for the specific ordered steps of the kind required in this situation."

The Implications/Outcome of these Scenarios: 

Nothing that has been stated has altered my approach because numbers necessarily do not translate to AUTHENTICITY, TRUTH, UNDERSTANDING AND SOUND DECISION-MAKING AS OPPOSE TO EXPEDIENT DECISION-MAKING. If those who follow the pathway of "whatever works" were supporting "credible" individuals instead of "free loaders" and "free loader-related" types, they would NOT be: 1) attempting to intimidate me to follow their cause, 2) electronically stealing my receipts and anything physically carried out to use as a means of attempting to demonstrate non-existent "legitimacy", which never lasts, using the methods documented in the post ELECTRONIC NETWORKING RECORDS FRAUD AN A SIGNIFICANT SCALE - UPDATED etc., 3) would not have to rely on unethical and/or thuggish practices, "whatever works" to obtain their outcomes as indicated in comment # 2 from the COMMENTS Page using their networking capability to prevent intuitions from carrying out their fiduciary responsibility and 4) would NOT have to resort to genocide to further their cause as depicted in the post IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TARNISHINGS OF A FORMER TOP PROSECUTOR AND THE POWERFUL WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN (UPDATED)? 

My conditions/criteria for volunteering have not changed because of the behavior of others, who use "whatever works", methods to rule the day and others have chosen to fall in with them rather than make tough but sound decisions as oppose to the type of practices as depicted in the post EXPEDIENT DECISION-MAKING, ALWAYS A MISTAKE (EDITED). My cause, namely that of the “Chisholm Family Inclusive” as well as that identified in # 8 remains regardless of those who have chosen to side with those who have swept them under the "Hempstead, election year debate table", because this is unfairness at its worse by those who desire much from contributing in the end very, very little, namely, participating in man's oldest profession. 

 

Conclusion:

If this effort were easy, an outcome would have been followed long ago, my dear friend and devoted mother, Lois, (see photos # 2 & 3 from My Photographic Journey Page) who most likely discovered something she was not supposed to and paid the ultimate price, in a land she though she "really" knew, having visited it on so many occasions before, which I can attest to, for at least on one of such occasions, she stayed at my family, Chapel Street residence as my guest and on other occasion, with the “Chisholm Family Inclusive”, Barbados' extensions, etc, (which does not include either Brazant or Sobers ancestries). Whatever it was, which was so shocking, that others wanted it to remain covered-up, led to her demise, and the remainder of her extensions, including sisters, Frances and her four children (who probably had grand children), and Muna with her fiance, "nicknamed", Jazz as well as her Mother/step father and the others, inclusive. Who gave anyone the right to determine what end those former meaningful lives were useful for in support of some "high speed rail" and other "free loaders" cause and their useless, tactless, meaningless and purposeless existences. For my sister to end up raising Lois' son as her own until his "accidental" drowning must have been tragic, frightening and contemptuous on the part of some who cowardly follow expedient decision-making and think that such is a demonstration of true leadership, its not. Real leadership requires courage, of the type depicted by those highlighted in the series of posts on this Site, such as EXAMPLES OF COURAGE! in addition to A CLOSER LOOK AT AN UNUSUAL FORM OF EXEMPLIFIED COURAGE (EDITED AND UPDATED), just as real "love" requires making on occasion, tough decisions instead of face-saving decisions, to the detriment of all those reliant on such individuals for carrying out what is in their best interests, who when given the choice to make, chose expediency and then try to manipulate others to follow suite, because it was determined that such a path was in the "best" interest of some therefore, it must be what's best for all by decree and all this in a "free" society. How noble of "some" to preach and not practice their own exhorting on the perils of "dictatorial" type behavior. After all, if it cannot be shown by example, what good is it, in all fairness, because a "picture" (or actual example of some action in progress) as the saying goes is worth a thousand words! 



                  the word "...in..." should be "...a glimpse..."

                  For additional pages of this letter from my late dear friend, which

                  is an example of a picture of history in progress being worth many

                  more words than even those depicted see the post

                  THE ACQUAINTANCE  WHOSE FRIENDSHIP WAS ...CON'ISTENT...

 

The criteria documented here represents a compilation of the various applicable details commented on over time, which collectively represents the how the offer of volunteer assistance was intended to be represented and will be pursued in a manner that clearly outlines the unique approach needed for times such as these, as follows: 2) generic offer to assist those very worthy individuals in need of assisting, 3) specific offer to assist Category of Compliance, et als case specifically, 4) re-emphasizing of directions/instructions to be followed for payment of funds owed by Coke, 5) stressing importance of instituting recommended measures for avoiding reliance on expedient decision-making, 6) highlights the steps to pursue that would clearly demonstrate leadership of the Franklin mold and 7) another manner for restating # 3 above more clearly that zeroes in on the specific areas in need of addressing to ensure the most effective outcomes for the main/subsidiary turn-around emphasis required. These measures clearly outline the intended approach, namely, to assist the applicable party in some meaningful way, as a viable alternative, as indicated, addressing various implied details from then to now, appropriately. 

THE OFFER TO PROVIDE VOLUNTARY ASSISTANCE TO ONE SHOULD SHE SEEK HIGHER ELECTIVE OFFICE, IS WITHDRAWN SEE ABOVE FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS.