Here are the Background Details:
There is a right way to get any point across, even when we are fully aware when others are mistreating us, because it is almost impossible afterwards to unravel what’s been said in haste or anger (because nothing should allow us to become so exasperated to repeat words that can render almost any situation “frozen” by our words, while they are the type of “fodder” in political circles that can render an opponent speechless, in order to gain an advantage, and, which those who favor such love to use against others and who themselves consider any other method, “throwing away the race.” However, when such methods are used against the very types advocating such means, they become even more “cold and calculating”, as they do not like the very measures advocated, “laid before their feet”. While it’s wrong to use such measures in the first place, in any eventuality it’s also hypocritical for those who would love to resort to such, to then be offended when the recipient of such activity. The same actions that such individuals are offended at when they are the recipients of should likewise not be meted out and/or directed/placed at the feet of others.
The Right Versus the Wrong Example for Such Types:
God has established a method of operation for almost any situation in the Bible; it just has to be known where such information is located for those who are interested. For the situation of those who find themselves in positions of the high office of rulers (or kings), God has a method of operation already laid out, and that is why the method chosen in order to get there is so very important. Having taken the “low” road to these high offices* (see FOOTNOTE), one can’t then follow a path of a messenger of peace and goodwill after having being an accessory to methods used such as the death and destruction that littered the pathway followed by some such individual(s) in the manner in, which their offices were used as “deadly” examples in a precursor to this event (if the records are checked), where another (such as a former colleague of his would shortly afterwards be brutalized to his end only for the information he came in possession of regarding an impostor hiding in the identity of another being exposed in relation to a certain foreign exchange act activity that appear on the Pages of these Blogs) to top this all off, while adding insult to injury (with this "oscar" worthy performance), check the records to find out the type of links/connections of those bystander(s) to whom "responsibility was attributed" for this heinous crime that befell his former colleague and for whom those who would be a "king" used the cover of his office to provide example for, while now attempting to be a "king" for all. If such types were a party to such atrocious activities of all types, its then impossible to be the type of example truly representative of the best interest of "all the people", while "pretending" to be exposing treasonable acts by others. The example for such is God Himself who such types should hold up for their own behavior against because the quest to gain much by using highly questionable practices to "taint" others to remove themselves from their own sordid track records in order to gain high office by "whatever works" methods; is NOT the way God expects from those who aspire to such high offices and represent Him.
The example God expects for such is found in Proverbs 16: 10-15, which state the following in verse 10, “A divine sentence is in the lips of the lips of the king: his mouth transgresseth not in judgment.” Verse 11, points out, “A just weight and balance are the Lord’ s: all the weighs of the bag are his work.” In verse 12, it states, “It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness.” Verse 13 emphasizes, “Righteous lips are the delight of kings; and they love him that speaketh right.” Verse 14 continues by pointing out, “The wrath of a king is as messengers of death: but a wise man will pacify it.” And in verse 15, it states, “In the light of the king’s countenance is life, and his favor is as a cloud of the latter rain.”
Conclusion:
In short, the high office of one who leads others should be carried out as a representative of God because that’s why such offices were implemented in the first place, namely to uphold “righteousness” and refrain from “wickedness”, which is an “abomination” to God and certainly should not be allowing such offices to be parcel to any stealth Trojan Horse replacement scheme that brutalizes the lives of unsuspecting individuals being ruled for the easy wealth generation cause of man’s oldest profession for a few at the expense of many and in a foreign Land where they have absolutely no right to be creating such an “image” by means of the “power” of their “shadowy consuming force”, in its “godlike” posture, which now represents that it can even “manufacture” babies on time and on demand, while replacing the lives of as many as needed to ensure the cause of their brutal wealth generating scheme continues unimpeded, how cynical. Only ONE has the right to determine outcomes and certainly not a “Misguided Development” that only knows how to carry out “cleverly” arranged for the cameras type face saving spectacles.” However, it must be remembered, that no situation enacted by man surprises God as His will is never impeded, regardless of how spectacular the “wonder” being implemented is.
On occasion leadership is attained by some in the hope that such advancement will be a quid pro quo arrangement for attaining their silence when in possession of acquired knowledge of a
To digress: With regards the Proposal photo switching, confirmation that such an action had taken place was revealed (in my opinion) when the Financial Institution's Chief of Security's after a discussion on a specific issue requested my passport photo. The then Security chief, Mr. Williams was surprised on receiving a copy of my then Passport photo bur did not indicate to me what his consternation was about but proceeded to ask me follow-up questions, which implied some issue was "out of place" (see below Proposal photos). The photo page had been sent via
To resume:
As previously stated on the pages of this Blog, when those with actual skills (not relying on continuous paid advertising as an indication of such as a reminder to "all", when such is far from the case otherwise self promoting ads would not have to be continually purchased as an indication of "legitimacy), where those with skills were busy carrying out activities in pursuit of goals, both professionally and personally, others were simply looking under every crevice for any illegal and/or unethical avenue in search of fleeting "legitimacy", (see listing # 5 from the post "FREE LOADERS" AND THEIR "CREDIBILlTY" THE UNTOLD STORY, UPDATED). It is at such times that the “true” nature of such an individual is demonstrated, whether expedient, or truly possessing: 1) character of a personal nature, 2) professional integrity and 3) sincerity of purpose when its needed most.
In addition, fear of the unknown is a very powerful tool, which can lead on occasion to conclusions of the worst possible outcome being drawn when there is no reason to expect that the type of scenario to be confronted will be very bad and in this environment, game-playing by those who are in absolutely no position to be pointing fingers takes place. How such matters should be approached is to take what is known at face value without adding or subtracting anything from it.
If for example, all that is known about specific situation is that the matter will be addressed over lunch (or dinner), at a place to be determined, accept that and take it at face value that the matter will be addressed privately over lunch or dinner without either adding the worst or fearing that a "hammer" will be dropped simply because they are unique issues involved that are in need of being addressed.
On the other hand, one of the most important reasons for a private, personal discussion could be due to the fact that many “stories” tend to abound in the absence of specific information in certain circumstances (and rightly so, meaning that withholding personal details is the better path to follow when its uncertain how much to or not to divulge to avoid giving fodder to those who thrive on such circumstances). However, this can give rise to the state of affairs in, which details lacking in substance and/or credibility are floated by and for those who are in the business of filtering/spreading such and then using them as complicating devices in the lives of those they choose to impact for their own personal self interests. What could be discussed in such a situation, are: 1) ways to avoid the potential complications that could be possible based on whatever potential relationship situation that could develop going forward and 2) the best way to approach such a scenario given the unique specific circumstances involved that is in the best interests of all parties involved.
There is a right way to get any point across, even when we are fully aware when others are mistreating us, because it is almost impossible afterwards to unravel what’s been said in haste or anger (because nothing should allow us to become so exasperated to repeat words that can render almost any situation “frozen” by our words, while they are the type of “fodder” in political circles that can render an opponent speechless, in order to gain an advantage, and, which those who favor such love to use against others and who themselves consider any other method, “throwing away the race.” However, when such methods are used against the very types advocating such means, they become even more “cold and calculating”, as they do not like the very measures advocated, “laid before their feet”. While it’s wrong to use such measures in the first place, in any eventuality it’s also hypocritical for those who would love to resort to such, to then be offended when the recipient of such activity. The same actions that such individuals are offended at when they are the recipients of should likewise not be meted out and/or directed/placed at the feet of others.
The Right Versus the Wrong Example for Such Types:
God has established a method of operation for almost any situation in the Bible; it just has to be known where such information is located for those who are interested. For the situation of those who find themselves in positions of the high office of rulers (or kings), God has a method of operation already laid out, and that is why the method chosen in order to get there is so very important. Having taken the “low” road to these high offices* (see FOOTNOTE), one can’t then follow a path of a messenger of peace and goodwill after having being an accessory to methods used such as the death and destruction that littered the pathway followed by some such individual(s) in the manner in, which their offices were used as “deadly” examples in a precursor to this event (if the records are checked), where another (such as a former colleague of his would shortly afterwards be brutalized to his end only for the information he came in possession of regarding an impostor hiding in the identity of another being exposed in relation to a certain foreign exchange act activity that appear on the Pages of these Blogs) to top this all off, while adding insult to injury (with this "oscar" worthy performance), check the records to find out the type of links/connections of those bystander(s) to whom "responsibility was attributed" for this heinous crime that befell his former colleague and for whom those who would be a "king" used the cover of his office to provide example for, while now attempting to be a "king" for all. If such types were a party to such atrocious activities of all types, its then impossible to be the type of example truly representative of the best interest of "all the people", while "pretending" to be exposing treasonable acts by others. The example for such is God Himself who such types should hold up for their own behavior against because the quest to gain much by using highly questionable practices to "taint" others to remove themselves from their own sordid track records in order to gain high office by "whatever works" methods; is NOT the way God expects from those who aspire to such high offices and represent Him.
The example God expects for such is found in Proverbs 16: 10-15, which state the following in verse 10, “A divine sentence is in the lips of the lips of the king: his mouth transgresseth not in judgment.” Verse 11, points out, “A just weight and balance are the Lord’ s: all the weighs of the bag are his work.” In verse 12, it states, “It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness.” Verse 13 emphasizes, “Righteous lips are the delight of kings; and they love him that speaketh right.” Verse 14 continues by pointing out, “The wrath of a king is as messengers of death: but a wise man will pacify it.” And in verse 15, it states, “In the light of the king’s countenance is life, and his favor is as a cloud of the latter rain.”
Conclusion:
In short, the high office of one who leads others should be carried out as a representative of God because that’s why such offices were implemented in the first place, namely to uphold “righteousness” and refrain from “wickedness”, which is an “abomination” to God and certainly should not be allowing such offices to be parcel to any stealth Trojan Horse replacement scheme that brutalizes the lives of unsuspecting individuals being ruled for the easy wealth generation cause of man’s oldest profession for a few at the expense of many and in a foreign Land where they have absolutely no right to be creating such an “image” by means of the “power” of their “shadowy consuming force”, in its “godlike” posture, which now represents that it can even “manufacture” babies on time and on demand, while replacing the lives of as many as needed to ensure the cause of their brutal wealth generating scheme continues unimpeded, how cynical. Only ONE has the right to determine outcomes and certainly not a “Misguided Development” that only knows how to carry out “cleverly” arranged for the cameras type face saving spectacles.” However, it must be remembered, that no situation enacted by man surprises God as His will is never impeded, regardless of how spectacular the “wonder” being implemented is.
On occasion leadership is attained by some in the hope that such advancement will be a quid pro quo arrangement for attaining their silence when in possession of acquired knowledge of a
 |
critical nature.
To digress: With regards the Proposal photo switching, confirmation that such an action had taken place was revealed (in my opinion) when the Financial Institution's Chief of Security's after a discussion on a specific issue requested my passport photo. The then Security chief, Mr. Williams was surprised on receiving a copy of my then Passport photo bur did not indicate to me what his consternation was about but proceeded to ask me follow-up questions, which implied some issue was "out of place" (see below Proposal photos). The photo page had been sent via
facsimile transmittal (that was working at the time) and then contacting him on the phone shortly after. However, those of the "free loader's cause" have extensive working capabilities and the Security Chief was replaced shortly after this development. This account was later closed by me in 2003 with a request that all remaining funds be transferred to my then USSBIA account, through, which the wire transfers to that account originated (see the post, CONNECTING THE DOTS FROM 1994 THROUGH 2004, ARBITRARILY for additional details about this USSBIA account).
To resume:
As previously stated on the pages of this Blog, when those with actual skills (not relying on continuous paid advertising as an indication of such as a reminder to "all", when such is far from the case otherwise self promoting ads would not have to be continually purchased as an indication of "legitimacy), where those with skills were busy carrying out activities in pursuit of goals, both professionally and personally, others were simply looking under every crevice for any illegal and/or unethical avenue in search of fleeting "legitimacy", (see listing # 5 from the post "FREE LOADERS" AND THEIR "CREDIBILlTY" THE UNTOLD STORY, UPDATED). It is at such times that the “true” nature of such an individual is demonstrated, whether expedient, or truly possessing: 1) character of a personal nature, 2) professional integrity and 3) sincerity of purpose when its needed most.
In addition, fear of the unknown is a very powerful tool, which can lead on occasion to conclusions of the worst possible outcome being drawn when there is no reason to expect that the type of scenario to be confronted will be very bad and in this environment, game-playing by those who are in absolutely no position to be pointing fingers takes place. How such matters should be approached is to take what is known at face value without adding or subtracting anything from it.
If for example, all that is known about specific situation is that the matter will be addressed over lunch (or dinner), at a place to be determined, accept that and take it at face value that the matter will be addressed privately over lunch or dinner without either adding the worst or fearing that a "hammer" will be dropped simply because they are unique issues involved that are in need of being addressed.
On the other hand, one of the most important reasons for a private, personal discussion could be due to the fact that many “stories” tend to abound in the absence of specific information in certain circumstances (and rightly so, meaning that withholding personal details is the better path to follow when its uncertain how much to or not to divulge to avoid giving fodder to those who thrive on such circumstances). However, this can give rise to the state of affairs in, which details lacking in substance and/or credibility are floated by and for those who are in the business of filtering/spreading such and then using them as complicating devices in the lives of those they choose to impact for their own personal self interests. What could be discussed in such a situation, are: 1) ways to avoid the potential complications that could be possible based on whatever potential relationship situation that could develop going forward and 2) the best way to approach such a scenario given the unique specific circumstances involved that is in the best interests of all parties involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment